Shannon bream and katie pavitt for the bell. Brett kavanaugh who committed some kind of Sexual Assault in high school has set aside into something different, something ugly, something threatening to all of us. Weve learned remarkably little from Brett Kavanaugh from Christian Ford in the past week, despite lots of words on their behalf. The facts of the case are still sparse and murky. But weve learned a disturbing amount of the left and what its willing to do in order to maintain control of this country. Watch a clip from today in which new york senator Kristen Gillibrand explained why she knows Brett Kavanaugh is guilty. Watch. I believe her because shes telling the truth. She is asking the fbi to investigate her claims. She is asking for that kind of review, that investigative work, that accountability, because shes telling the truth. Somebody lying does not ask the fbi to investigate their claims. Who is not asking the fbi to investigate these claims . The white house. Dr. Kavanaugh excuse me, judge kavanaugh has not asked, have the recipe i review these claims. Is that the reaction of an innocent person . It is not. Tucker tried to ignore the yelling and the theatrics and the pure demagoguery for a moment and focus on Kirsten Gillibrands reasoning, to the extent there is any. I believe her because shes telling the truth. In logic class, the collet circular reasoning, which is not reasoning at all. It simply demanding you believe something because someone else is asserting it. Children talk this way. You think a u. S. Senator would be embarrassed. Its the second part of her statement you should Pay Attention to because its scary. Kavanaugh hasnt called yet for another fbi investigation to himself, therefore senator gillibrand says he did
it. Is that the reaction of a innocent person, she thunders . Its not. Not since the mccarthy era almost 70 years ago have lawmakers talk like this in the country, unless you call an fbi investigation of yourself you are guilty of a crime. Joe mccarthy himself never said anything like that who , too reckless for him. A leading candidate for president ial nomination drops this and the media hardly notice. There is a new standard in washington. Kristen gillibrand is a friend of Harvey Weinstein. A picture of two of them together. Weinstein has been accused of rape. Did she know about his assaults . Is she in a sensory to the equipment we asked these questions. Why has the fbi not demand an fbi investigation to herself. Is that the reaction of a innocent question . Look at the fbi, interview her under oath, surprise her at her home at dawn with a search warrant. While they are at it, they should take a close look at her relation ship with bill clinton and other accused rapists. If she hesitates . Press charges. This is lunatic. Liberals understand that it is. Democrats dont want Brett Kavanaugh in court because they disagree with him and thats understandable, by the way. They are angry that the Republican Senate refused to vote on mayor garland, thats understandable too. Whats now is dangerous in a way that is dangerous, and the matter who you voted for in 2016. Extremism has exploded on the left and nobody is trying to contain it. Here is one particularly jarring example of that. This is congressman John Garamendi of california. We know him well. One of the few House Democrats willing to come on the show. I dont agree with garamendi but i find him a decent person always. Heres what he said about the
it helps them contain their power, so they are happy to do it. Men against women, black against white, divide and conquer. Whatever it takes. In the end, its unlikely that well ever know conclusively what happened between Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Ford 36 years ago, if anything at all. But its Crystal Clear whats happening right now its a power grab. Its hurting the country, destroying our centuries old traditions of justice and empowering and demagogues. We ought to shut it down right now. And yet, this is late breaking news, before air breaking time, this may go on and on. Republicans on the health and they are considering delaying the hearing scheduled for monday at this point. Brett kavanaugh will be testifying by himself. To some future date. Because of the rules of the senate, that will push back the vote on kavanaugh by at least a week, if not more. Which is, of course, the whole point. To drag the country through this pointless charade, this circus
which divides us and hurts us and the grades are standard for justice simply for political ends. Thats where we are. Professor, im glad youre here. As a law professor, i want to ask you about what senator gillibrand said today. Shes a lawyer as well, i believe. She said the new standard is unless you call for an fbi investigation into yourself, you are by definition guilty. Is that a Legal Standard that you recognize . What i like to think about is if i were, as Brett Kavanaugh says, An Innocent Man, and i were falsely accused of something this serious, what would i want to . And i teach civil procedure and i think about criminal procedure. I think through that question. What i want is a process that is regarded as so fair, even by my ideological adversaries, that i would be able to the left democrats in my life be able to point to the process say we have this out and everyone can agree the way we did it was fair and i
was cleared. Thats what i would want. I think i would both agree that the first thing you would want in that tucker he hasnt received at that, none of us have. Barring that, and im not attacking her, but i think it should be distressed that she shes not explaining her software thats not what shall a brand said. She said if you do not ask for and in a vacation in yourself, thats an indication youre guilty. Thats the same as as a third d standard. And its hard to believe in elected senator would say that. You arent surprised about that . Two things. Number one, if i were An Innocent Man, i would actually welcome the fbi investigating. I might not call for it but i would say, sure, investigate. You would see that im An Innocent Man for the second thing, im listening to you talk to this. You said, and you pointed out
quite correctly, many of the senior members of the Democratic Party are incredibly associated with important predators like Harvey Weinstein and to your point i would say its a good idea to does investigate that. Which i do agree with. Tucker no its not a partisan issue. The point im making is the guilt by investigation is a low and immoral tactic and we use to revile people who made that like senator joe mccarthy. Its commonplace so we dont notice it. If you have dinner with somebody who has unsavory views or unpopular views, you could be fired. Weve seen people fired for that very thing. Guilt by association is not the same as guilt. So to say that because Kirsten Gillibrand was friends with Harvey Weinstein and an she is somehow accessory to his predation is totally wrong. I would never make that claim. I was merely saying thats not what youre suggesting. Tucker what im suggesting is that innocent people have a
moral obligation to call it upon themselves with an fbi investigation. Its insane i agree with that. But if i were An Innocent Man, i wouldnt think of it as my obligation but rather my privilege. If i were Brett Kavanaugh, and im An Innocent Man, i would insist on pointing every camera at my face and denying these allegations. I want everyone to see it. Wouldnt you . Tucker i think hes been the subject of six fbi investigations into his background checks. Theyll make by federal agents and i believe hes Testifying Md hell say i dont know what sheg about. She, by contrast, the reason we are having this conversation, leveled the charge of felonious behavior against a public official and refuse to explain yourself. Where is the onus on her quite make shes dragged the whole country and a shortcircuited process and not bothered to expanders on . I know you arent supposed to blame the victim, but shes not
in charge of the whole country. Why Isnt She Being asked of the story . Look, the government is entitled to every persons evidence. It would be useful if she testified. Again, keep with the frame a little bit. If i were Brett Kavanaugh and i were An Innocent Man i would say, look, i dont want to testify on monday, take a week, take a month. When this is done, and im confirmed, i will not live myself under a crowd dell mcleod is because the reason we rush through it is the one i understand. If if you face opponents that yu publicly were declared you were guilty on the basis of evidence, the fact you didnt request an fbi investigation into yourself, you would acknowledge you are dealing with unreasonable people who are dealing with just if you are merely trying to destroy your life or political ends. Or am i being crazy here . Am i what i would say is, fine,
do you want to delay the hearing for a month . Fine. Look into it. Tucker if you accused me anonymously im An Innocent Man. Tucker when you have people saying what Kristen Gillibrand said today or what congressman you deal with people who dont care about justice. I know pick a prosecutors often dont. Tucker i agree. Position yourself as these people arent reasonable. If i give them everything they want tucker hes doing that monday professor, thank you very much. Thank you very much for having me. Tucker our longterm investigation into google and its behavior and practices, we have internal documents show google employees trying to use the companys Search Engine to
undermine the administrationS Immigration policy without telling you. Secretively and dishonestly. The news have been overwhelming tonight. A break from the madness is two time on champions faceoff in the ultimate final exam. They are Shannon Bream and Katie Pavlich. Coming up. Will it feel like the wheend of a journey . P working, or the beginning of something even better . When you prepare for retirement with pacific life, you can create a lifelong income. So you have the freedom to keep doing whatever is most meaningful to you. A reliable income that lets you retire, without retiring from life. Thats the power of pacific. Ask your financial professional about pacific life today. Breathe right strips are designed to simply when nighttime Nasal Congestion closes in, open your nose right back up. Breathe better. Sleep better. Breathe right. And im still going for my best even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. So if theres a better treatment than warfarin, im up for that. Eliquis. Eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. Plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. Eliquis is fdaapproved and has both. So whats next . Seeing these guys. Dont Stop Taking Eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. Eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. Dont take eliquis if you have an Artificial Heart Valve or abnormal bleeding. While taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. Seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. Eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. Tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. Eliquis, the number one cardiologistprescribed blood thinner. Ask your doctor if eliquis is whats next for you. Cardiologistprescribed blood thinner. Google. But what if google is lying to you . What if the results you got were secretly waited to get you to vote a certain way, to believe . That would affect a lot of people and a lot of votes. It would be impossible to have a real democracy under circumstances like that. A small number of incredibly rich people would be in charge of everything, including your perceptions. That is a major concern for all of us because google is a very Political Company who recently showed your email evidence of a google effort to collude with a leftwing group in support of Hillary Clinton the pots are as president ial campaign. We have internal documents that google employees are corrupting the Search Engine to push propaganda on hundreds of millions of own funds except google employees began plotting ways to Under Manning the president executive order. A google Product Marketing manager named mckenzie thomas
send an email to a group of fellow employees. There is a large brainstorm going through the marketing orb, writing about how to respond to trumps order. Along thomas ideas is to counter algorithmic results as far as iran, latino, and so forth, google wanted to make them more positive for political reasons. Thomas promote the links for making donations to organizations fighting the travel ban. This, of course, would be completely dishonest and unethical behavior. But thomas colleagues google seemed to approve it strongly. Rami bana responded, absolutely income of kenzie. Well put you a list of orbis with merrill and hl team. Stacie chan added groups she had thought they should promote including the aclu, the immigrants defense project, the
national Immigration Law center. All of those groups at the time agitating against the president S Immigration ban. Even at least one person on the team seem to realize how dangerous and out of the ordinary this conversation was. A google employee called clement wolf quoted he was very much in favor of google stepping up, but was wondering how partisan we want to be on this. To the extent of my knowledge, wed be breaching president if we only give highlights access to organizations who support a certain view. We contacted google about these remarkable emails and reply to wes is here in full. These emails were a brainstorm of ideas, and none ever implemented. Google has never modified Search Results to promote a political ideology, not in the Current Campaign season, not during the 2016 election, not in the aftermath of president trumps order on immigration. Our processes improperly policies would not have allowed
us to nor did google say anything about these employees on this email chain. Presume believe they still work at google, which is remarkable. If you ran a bank and you caught your child is brains telling how to rob the vault, will they still work for you . Google fired a engineer named james damar, flew back to fire him, wipe like that because he was caught making conservative ideas in a private memo. Here the Conversation Leak secretly, but its fine with google. It shouldnt be fine with the u. S. Congress who is testified it would be nice if one elected representative asked about this, because its much scarier anything that russia ever attempted. Peter schweitzer of clinton
cash, he joins us tonight. Are you surprised by this . Not really. Further confirmation that google has been cooking the books as it relates to search. Youre absolutely right. This would be like a company having a Brainstorming Session on how we are going to fiddle with the books and accounting. You are going a step back and say, no, we were just having a Brainstorming Session. It speaks to the culture of the company. They are prepared to put their thumb on the scale and shift the debate in favor of the direction they want to go. This is so corrupt. I was stunned by it. I was worried these emails were not authentic because search is the core of googles business. Many different things, but its a Search Engine. It was built on the back of one. The promise has been they are not lying to you. But they are. Thats right. This is the third strike as far as im concerned. The third strike is the commercial search, when travel
websites and people like yelp were complaining that they were tilting the algorithm against them to others. Google said, absolutely not. We would never do that. The federal trade commission, the e. U. , has looked at this and said google was fiddling with the algorithm. That second strike was the work died by Robert Epstein that shows clearly in 2016 that search was tilted to favor Hillary Clinton. This is strike three, shows the culture of the company is such that they are very happy having a free and open conversation about manipulating the algorithm on a highly political tucker people go to jail for violating Campaign Finance laws because they put an extra ad on a Cable Channel no one watches. This is the most powerful company in the world. How could we have a democracy in the country were google can get whoever it wants elected by lying through us through the Search Function . I