Transcripts For GBN Headliners 20240703 : vimarsana.com

Transcripts For GBN Headliners 20240703

Officials turned up to an exercise to prepare for wartime scenarios, which was meant for the whole of government. He called on ministers to do more to prepare for conflict. Former defence secretary ben wallace agreed with his colleague and said too many in government were, quote, just hoping everything will go away. Everything will go away. For the latest stories , you can for the latest stories, you can sign up to gb news alerts. Scan the qr code on your screen, or you can go to gb news common alerts. Now its over to headliners. Headliners. Hello welcome to headliners. Im josh howie taking you through tomorrows newspapers for the next hour. And this evening im joined by the eric and ernie of the headliners crew. Louis schaefer and nick dixon. You dont look happy. You dixon. You dont look happy. You dont look happy about that. Presumably im eric. Presumably im eric. Well, yeah, im sure. What . Louis, you look genuinely upset about that. About that. I never watched sesame street. Okay, sesame street , are you okay, sesame street, are you gonna give me anything . Comedian. Yeah, im gonna be your sort of recalcitrant straight. No, youre always asking, no, but youre always asking, how you . You know, are how are you . You know, how are you and you always. How you doing . And you always. How are exactly . Are you doing, exactly . But i thought ask. Thought you were going to ask. Oh, are you doing, louis . How are you doing, louis . How are you doing, louis . Dont mind your own business . Great. Great. Lets have a quick look at sundays pages. The mail sundays front pages. The mail on sunday in own tweets. The on sunday in her own tweets. The proof reina has been lying. The sunday telegraph, uk failing to prepare for war, says ex ministers sunday times. Britains support for israel is not unconditional, warns cameron. The observer cameron warns of gaza famine as navy sent to aid he. The starving and sunday mirror corrie cast of living crisis. Daily star sunday psycho seagulls copying humans. Right. What have the mail gone with . Louis the mail is gone with, in her own words, in her own tweets, the proof rayner has been lying. And the mail on sunday unearths photos taken by labours deputy, that exposed the truth about her house. Row, row. She has a hat. She got a house. One of those Council Houses that shes complaining about that the tories are always taking advantage of. She got it. She held on to it for five years, which i think is too early and then she sold it and she said she wasnt living in it. She she was living in it. She she was. It was a home. She said she was. It was a home. It was hoax. She wasnt living it was a hoax. She wasnt living in it. It a home and a hoax. It was a home and a hoax. It was a home and a hoax. It was it was a hoax because she wasnt living it. But she wasnt living in it. But then sorry. Then again, then again. Sorry. The i can see. Its only the i can just see. Ill nick there. Hes just hes literally chomping at bit literally chomping at the bit to get this. Get on this. Well, its just i spent all afternoon looking at Angela Rayners of rayners cushions as part of my job we can now job in what i think we can now call gate. And im call cushion gate. And im trying this story. Trying to research this story. Josh what do you think . I dont know, that knowledgeable know, im not that knowledgeable about never. About cushions. Ive never. I thought never owned thought you were never owned one, man, one, yeah, but im a single man, so seen a cushion. So ive never seen a cushion. But yeah, its great but but yeah, its not great because shes there saying, look, live this look, i didnt live at this home, yet shes there saying home, and yet shes there saying things like, just got back. There pictures of there are pictures of the cushions children cushions that her children look like there. Like theyre living there. Neighbours children like theyre living there. Neigiliving children like theyre living there. Neigiliving there, children like theyre living there. Neigiliving there, so children like theyre living there. Neigiliving there, so yes,iren like theyre living there. Neigiliving there, so yes, its were living there, so yes, its not great. And the other home, the that she she didnt the one that she said she didnt live she known as the live at, she was known as the landlady neighbours said landlady and neighbours said they didnt see her. So its very, tricky for very, very tricky for, for Angela Rayner. Problem Angela Rayner. And the problem is, theres the is, of course, theres the deception that seems to deception element that seems to be there, allegedly. Dont know what allowed to say, but be there, allegedly. Dont know what theresillowed to say, but be there, allegedly. Dont know what theres also ed to say, but be there, allegedly. Dont know what theres also the, say, but be there, allegedly. Dont know what theres also the, the i, but be there, allegedly. Dont know what theres also the, the yout then theres also the, the you know, theres the initial thing that you cut corners , people cut that you cut corners, people cut corners, and a corners, they try and make a little money, whatever. Little extra money, whatever. Theres gains theres a Capital Gains tax issue, the electoral issue, theres the electoral roll youve your roll issue. Youve got your podcast. Yeah. Then also podcast. Yeah. But then also theres deception issue. Theres now the deception issue. And then theres the hypocrisy issue because she was so tough on rishi sunaks wife about the non dom status. She was tough on nadhim about tax Nadhim Zahawi about his tax status. And there was a partygate. Now its very, partygate. So now its very, very difficult position. Now the problem is that he problem for starmer is that he doesnt get rid of one doesnt want to get rid of one of key people. Hes got his of his key people. Hes got his gang hes hes plotting gang of four. Hes hes plotting his little sofa meetings where the essentially to the worlds essentially going to be not, the be run. Not, not just the country, the world by starmer, rayner others. Country, the world by starmer, raj he r others. Country, the world by starmer, rajhe doesnt others. Country, the world by starmer, rajhe doesnt want others. Country, the world by starmer, rajhe doesnt want to others. Country, the world by starmer, rajhe doesnt want to get hers. Country, the world by starmer, rajhe doesnt want to get rid;. Country, the world by starmer, rajhe doesnt want to get rid of so he doesnt want to get rid of her. Because whos going to her. Why . Because whos going to come in as deputy . Like come in as deputy . Someone like burgon, zarah burgon, someone like Zarah Sultana . No, radical sultana . No, no, no radical lefty. Wants to stick to lefty. So he wants to stick to his own. Agree a lot of your i agree with a lot of your analysis. I think comparing the billions were billions of sunak to what were talking about here, which is one council flat, is slightly different. But terms of who different. But in terms of who he was forced to he brings in, he was forced to bnng he brings in, he was forced to bring rayner because to bring in rayner because to appease the far left vote, now he control of the labour he has control of the labour party and the back back office. He could bring in who he wants. Hes bring in any hes not going to bring in any of he doesnt want of those people. He doesnt want raynen of those people. He doesnt want rayner, with her. Rayner, he has to deal with her. Then is he has he been why then is he has he been very on this issue and very weird on this issue and kind of ignored it and said she doesnt deputy and it makes it. Its going to make at this point, of course its going to make bad. Point, of course its going to ma yeah, bad. Point, of course its going to ma yeah, right. Bad. Point, of course its going to ma yeah, right. But� ad. Point, of course its going to ma yeah, right. But ifi. Point, of course its going to ma yeah, right. But if you yeah, right. But if you really rid of it, really want to get rid of it, theres much more could theres so much more he could have been very coy have done. Hes been very coy about it. He tried to keep her in the past, the problem was he past, but the problem was he didnt the enough didnt control the party enough at to able get didnt control the party enough at of to able get didnt control the party enough at of so able get didnt control the party enough at of so when le get didnt control the party enough at of so when l€did get rid of her. So when it did all kick off tried it, kick off and he tried it, basically there too basically there was just too much stink and he actually much of a stink and he actually had her promotion. Had to give her a promotion. So what will he do now . So what will he do now . Well, i think i think to well, now i think i think to be itll how it be honest, itll see how it goes. To what level goes. Hell see to what level this think this gets to. I dont think he wants her this wants to get rid of her this close an election because close to an election because i think is, she i dont know think she is, she i dont know if you her story, but she if you read her story, but she has quite a remarkable background, regardless of this council i think council flat or not, and i think he doesnt want do Anything Council flat or not, and i think he doegoingrant do Anything Council flat or not, and i think he doegoingranjeopardise thing thats going to jeopardise his lead. That hes lead. And i think that hes scared anything because scared of doing anything because hes in the at the moment. Hes in the lead at the moment. Question will will the question is, will he will he not dealing he lose people by not dealing with red wall with it . Because the red wall people happy people may not be happy with this. May able to pass this. You may be able to pass off hypocrisy, but many off the hypocrisy, but many wont off the hypocrisy, but many worno, im passing off the no, im not passing off the hypocrisy. Im saying hypocrisy. But what im saying is, the is, lets not compare the billions here i do compare billions here with i do compare it i compare it because i do compare it. And this why is it and also this is why is it not no, no, its about not similar . No, no, its about deception. Owning deception. Its about not owning up thats i think up to it. It is. Thats i think lying bad. Up to it. It is. Thats i think lyirand bad. At some point and i think at some point youre get caught. And i think at some point youand get caught. And i think at some point youand she get caught. And i think at some point youand she hasget caught. And i think at some point youand she has beeniught. And i think at some point youand she has been caught and she has been caught and she probably has not paid taxes if she was the landlord. If he, if she was the landlord. So the so thats theft from the government. It is a bad thing. The the the difference between the tories how tories and the labour is how much the tories steal versus how much the tories steal versus how much steals, but its much labour steals, but its still sounds still stealing. It sounds like this. That this. But this is the thing that people about people dont understand about this shocked this country. Which shocked me, is everyone country is how everyone in this country is how everyone in this country is in on a scheme and is on a scam. Theyve got something in their mind in their back pocket that theyre keeping secret. That theyre keeping secret. Theyre all, yeah, because were much less wealthy countries. An old decaying were an old decaying country, which where were poorer poorest state in poorer than the poorest state in america, mississippi. So you have were just have to understand, were just grasping can. Grasping for anything we can. Its a vague, vaguely its not like a vague, vaguely functioning yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely fun i ioning yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think] yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think it yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think it has yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think it has to yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think it has to do yours. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think it has to do with rs. Its not like a vague, vaguely funi think it has to do with the i think it has to do with the royal family and that the people it not it has to do it. No, im not even kidding. Because even kidding. Its like because people feel like they that people feel like they are that they marginalised and that they are marginalised and that their wealth has been stolen by their wealth has been stolen by the rich people. So someone like the rich people. So someone like Angela Rayner says, im going to get a little bit backwards. And Angela Rayner says, im going to get moree bit backwards. And Angela Rayner says, im going to get more question youre wrong. Next up is a surwell nick. Youre wrong. Next up is a surwell , nick. Youre wrong. Next up is a surwell , you nick. Youre wrong. Next up is a surwell , you did nick. Youre wrong. Next up is a surwell , you did say k. Youre wrong. Next up is a surwell , you did say that hes well, you did say that hes wrong. So uk failing to wrong. So the uk failing to prepare war say x ministers. Prepare for war say x ministers. This comes from heappey this comes from James Heappey hope thats the correct pronunciation. Hes a former Armed Forces Minister and hes basically saying have clue basically saying we have no clue if war, where if it gets to war, where basically dads army, no disrespect to those fine gentlemen, hes saying that gentlemen, but hes saying that wars National Endeavour wars are National Endeavour and were behind. Hes were a long way behind. Hes saying hes 43 and they havent given serious thought to how hell prepare for war since he was primary and so, was in primary school. And so, yes , im not looking good. Not yes, im not looking good. Not particularly that our particularly shocking that our military for war, military is not ready for war, but its just confirmation once again not again that were totally not ready. Because. Ready. Because. Because the because the because the british god bless them, british people, god bless them, theyre lovely people, but theyre lovely people, but theyre for anything. Theyre not ready for anything. Theyve lost their theyve lost. Theyve lost their sense of you have a lot you, sense of you have a lot of you, not all the people who not all of you. The people who watch this channel, i dont think theyve the think have. Theyve lost the sense and sense of nationhood, and nafionhood sense of nationhood, and nationhood you nationhood needs to be. You need to your nation. And on to fight for your nation. And on every metric. Thats not the every metric. Thats not the right word. But it sounded good. Is that british people dont recognise that their country is in danger. Well, i think that its not just the british people i feel like its what the article here is about. Other government doesnt necessarily recognise its not in danger. Think that labour is and you think that labour is going better . Going to be better . No, but there is no preparation. The point we preparation. But the point is we came end of came on the back of the end of the people got lazy. The cold war. People got lazy. We dont have any of these war plans. Like it how plans. I do like it how its always a person always when a person quits. Theyre the way, always when a person quits. Thequitting the way, always when a person quits. Thequitting now. The way, always when a person quits. Thequitting now. But|e way, always when a person quits. Thequitting now. But just ay, always when a person quits. Thequitting now. But just while always when a person quits. Tquit, itting now. But just while always when a person quits. Tquit, heresiow. But just while always when a person quits. Tquit, heres whatsit just while i quit, heres whats wrong, which i didnt actually cover whilst yeah. And whilst i was employed. Yeah. And were much better at sea, although weve that now completely. Cant stop dinghies. Completely. Yeah, nt stop dinghies. Completely. Yeah, youre dinghies. Completely. Yeah, youre right. Dinghies. So. Yeah, youre right. About. Its about having its about. Its about having the will, the will to live. Its a nietzsche, the will, the will money the the will and the money and the soldiers. Yeah, but the will and the stuff, actually the stuff, youre actually threatened as opposed to preparing advance, this preparing an advance, which this country particularly preparing an advance, which this country doing particularly preparing an advance, which this countrydoing as particularly preparing an advance, which this country doing as weve cularly preparing an advance, which this countrydoing as weve seen. Y preparing an advance, which this countrydoing as weve seen over bad at doing as weve seen over the last case could made for that. All right. Lets move on to. Theres another here, theres another story here, children. Psychological harm, if allowed gender. Allowed to change gender. Landmark warns. Now landmark trans review warns. Now this is finally the publishing of the cass report. Nick. Yes . Oh, i forgot we were getting on to this one, but why dont you take it . Justin, this is your expert topic. Well, its just weve been waiting, breaking format. Well, its just weve been wai im, breaking format. Well, its just weve been wai im breaking] format. Well, its just weve been wai im breaking the format. Well, its just weve been wai im breaking the formatt. Im breaking the format because they gave like, because they gave me, like, four stories before, stories a minute before, and they got know they said, you got to know everything them. Everything about all of them. I knew andrew his knew all about andrew and his blooming cushions. Look, you should right. Well, look, you should say say it and say he should say it to me and make me look bad. And thats the comedy and thats where the comedy comes right, well, gist all right, well, the gist of it wait this report it is we wait for this report now the last two years now for the last two years finally published, and the finally being published, and the most theyve most damning thing theyve said is that putting children and changing in changing their names whilst in school, psychological school, it has a psychological repercussions and will actually can for life into can lock them in for life into medical, transitioning. So this is pretty damning when weve also seen, different schools across the country, primary schools giving false advice to parents and to themselves. This is not a good then again, then again, theres this. This gets categorised well. They would say this. They would say this. Of course, if youre against it , say this. Of course, if youre against it, of course youre going to say it. On the other hand, ive heard ive heard tons and people, including an

© 2025 Vimarsana