Buildings who may realize some benefits from protection under article 10. If some of them voiced some support for this. If we had that then we would also have a group of people who might be enthusiastic about providing additional information, documentation and support for moving forward so what i would like to really see if you could get some of your friends and neighbors involved in this, so they could be a Real Community based effort. Yes, actually we could open Public Comment again. Yes, so you could come forward. We have a Neighborhood Group that has pet pretty much everyone living on the street and were always in communication and about five of the people were planning on coming but i think its because in the middle of the day and they work. We did receive a number we received emails from others on the block that were supportive. Theyre all support. Its just the time of the day they couldnt make it. Okay thank you very much. I think what were up against is that as we juggle our priorities on the landmark Designation Program what areas does staff focus on . I am in support of adding or currentlying the applicants to continue this but as we get further into prioritizing the landmarks we want to initiate you know have to be cognizant of how much time this takes. Yeah, i would second that in that im supportive of this the idea of this district and i am very pleased that the neighborhood has come forward and i agree its a special place, and its worthy. I think the question is whether we what i guess i dont want to say its now first on the list because we have other things we have been putting off and i wonder whether we consider adding it to the list and not ranking it yet until the next hearing about our prioritization of the program, so we know its on the list and we have to figure out the timing of it of. Hawses hawses. Can the community do that and run it through the building [inaudible] proposal [inaudible] yeah. Commissioner hyland. Actually i think thats the question mr. Hawses is effort effort does the Community Based nominations maybe staff could come back with an evaluation of that. My feel and understanding it takes as much time, pretty close. Yeah. As i recall our program does not does it have any districts in it at all right now . Tim Frye Department staff. At this time it does not. However one of the summer intern projects is begin collecting data on the rousseau district which is the buildings in the sunset by the architect Henry Rousseau and something we were going to bring in summer for the continuation of the work program. So commissioners any thoughts about adding to the program but not well, i will say we have this discussion frequently, and as you know i do not believe that if everything is a priority anything is a priority, so we have in the past identified a ranking of our projects, and i think that given the state of this one i would be very happy with adding it to the list, not adding it to the top of the list but adding to the bottom of the list so these things move up in some order with appropriate exceptions being made, but i think that we have to start somewhere, and so i would very much like to start. I would move that we add to the landmark Designation Program and then bee study well, i would add to landmark Designation Program. I second that. Okay. Is this an informational item . Do we have a motion . I thought there was. Is there a motion for it or there is no formal motion to adopt. Its a recommendation. Its a recommendation to staff just to provide direction and then we will work with the project sponsor to file a formal application. We will add it to the work program and we can discuss it during the Quarterly Report which is here in a month or so and talk about the timing of when it would come back for initiation. Okay. We should definitely explore the larger context. Great. And i had one question just about a particular property, the parking lot on the southwest corner. Is there a Development Planned for that . We can look into that. Im not sure. Would it be unusual i mean i guess my concern is if theres a threat to the district its that parcel and whether we might consider including that parcel in the district or not. To provide some sort of design guideline. Right. And thats the entry to the whole street and if that is a really incompatible structure and for the purposes of ceqa the impact of the district and outside of the california register district would that be considered . Ceqa doeses consideration to adjacent resources so it would be likely studied but i dont know the level of Environmental Review is required without seeing the project. Okay. I think we might want to consider move forward with the district whether we include that parcel within the district. We can show both options. So i think you have direction from the commission. I am hearing a unanimous sense here so we did move forward with the next item. Thank you. Thank you to the members of the public for coming today. Thank you commissioners. That places us have case four for onondaga avenue. I am here to present the landmark designation on onondaga avenue and known as the alemany Emergency Hospital and health center. Following the sponsor designation application it is buildings were adding to the landmark designation work program on may 2015. At the february hearing the commission initiated designation of the buildings and to defining features to include the sky light and the relationship to the space below. The community is very supportive of landmark designation and supervisor avalos intends to sponsor the legislation. Department supports this as a article 10 landmark. The draft resolution recommending designation to the board of supervisors is included in the packet. If approved department the department will approved today the department will forward this to the board of supervisors and the applicants are here to answer questions and i can answer questions. This is not about the landmark designation but for the city and its deemed Surplus Property and what is the process that the property is sold . Is there an rfp process and whats the process . Commissioners tim Frye Department staff. It was Surplus Property but from the department of real estate and request of the community and supervisor avalos the property will be remained as a city property. Mr. Rothman is in the audience and may have more about a recent hearing he attended that discussed obtaining some additional money for the building but its my understanding that it will do that. Okay thank you. Commissioners any questions before Public Comment . At this time we will take Public Comment on the landmark recommendation for 3445 onondaga avenue. If you have comment please come forward. You have three minutes and there is a warning buzzer at 30 seconds. Commissioners thank you. I dont think it will take three minutes. My name is david hooper and i spoke to you regarding this issue. There is support for returning the buildings to public service, not just serving the structures but doing that for the community. At the same time earlier there was a request for a supplemental budget request for the Geneva Office building and 3045. Those efforts continue to get the money. Theyre not secured but i would like to say there is support and what the Emergency Hospitals mean historically and what they meant to past generations. There is a gap because they havent been used effectively but with the streetscape there are four islands and they call them pork chops and one of the plans for the department of public works is provide Better SafetyPedestrian Access at this intersection at onondaga avenue and alemany to be in the configuration and no more of the quick right turns. This gives an opportunity to have a plaz there at the club in the area and the high schools and at Mission Street and its a major opportunity. Thank you for considering it. Thank you. Mr. Rothman please come forward. Were always happy to see you. Richard rothman seems like i have been at every meeting in the last couple of months. I am supporting the landmark designation. Now, i was at the engage hearing and they did Budget Hearing and sent without recommendation the funding for the geneva car barn but they left unsettled about onondaga. Supervisor avalos wanted to leave it on by the call of the chair but im not sure what happened because i will have to find out, but money wasnt appropriated to move forward for the building, but i got an email, was copied on an email from the Art Commission and theyre putting money in their Capital Budget to help restore the building, so if the building does stay as a city owned building then the Art Commission would be responsible for the murals but if it goes to a nonprofit then it would be up to the nonprofit, but i know i dont want to speak for the Art Commission, but i know they are very big supporters of the murals in this city, and so thank you for considering this and moving this along, and we need to get this building open so people can appreciate these beautiful murals and restore the mural on the first floor. Thank you again. Thank you and thank you for all your work on this project. Does any other member of the public wish to speak to this item . If so please come forward. Seeing none. Public comment is now closed and bring it back to the commission. I move to approve. I second that. We have a motion and a second. Theres a motion and seconded to approve this matter. On that motion commissioner hasz. Yes. Commissioner johns. Yes. Commissioner matsuda. Yes. Commissioner pearlman. Yes. Commissioner hyland. Yes. Commissioner wolfram. Yes. So moved that passes unanimously 60 and places you on case nine for 2011. 1356e, line three central soma context statement and Historic Resources survey. Before we take that item there is a report on the one building and i am wondering because commissioner hyland has a relationship with them but its one component. That was submitted as Public Comment. So its not related to the actual item . It does change the survey findings that hra tim Frye Department staff. I would defer to the City Attorney if a recusal is necessary. Perhaps i will jump into it. Theres a survey finding that the Property Owner disagreed with. They hired arg to prepare a Historic Resource evaluation and included in the commissioners packets for consideration for changing one of the status codes in in the survey. I am the City Attorney so just so understand the situation their work is completed . It is completed and submitted as part of the packet as Public Comment to the findings in the survey. Public comment and theres no pending work right now as far as there was a project. There is a project proposed at the site but i dont believe arg is involved in the project. Okay. So i would suggest it sounds like its not necessary for the commissioner to recuse. Maybe i can disclose this is my former company which i had currently have financial ties to but very limited. That sounds good. I think we can move forward now. Thank you for that clarification. Good afternoon commissioners. Susan Parks Department staff. The item is a consideration to adopt the central soma context statement and Historic Resources survey. Todays items are the first in a series of steps towards completion of the central soma plan. As part of the plan the department developed the central soma context statement and provide framework for consistent evaluations of propertys in the area. This statement was written by Department Staff and reviewed by the survive group and professionals and historians and members of the south of market filipino community. The central soma Historic Context statement the department relied on so macontext and redevelopment efforts in the area and the creation of the moscone center. Historic Resources Survey was conducted in order to provide information on the distribution of resources within the planned area for the purposes of Long Range Planning and for use and permitting and review on registers. Much of the south of market were addressed in Previous Survey efforts so the central soma survey focused on Properties Within the boundaries of the central soma plan that were not previously surveyed or information was incomplete. Im going to jonahs if you could turn on the overhead. I will let you take a look at the plan. The map of the survey area. Department staff conducted reconnance information from 201314 and included 134 parse parsels bounded by market and townsend from second to 6th streets in the area. 63 properties were identified as age eligible and were surveyed along with 11 previously identified Historic Resources. Those were documented and evaluated by staff. You can see those in the data base and the individual survey sheets. 31 properties were determined eligible for listing on the california register including 22 buildings within an identified Mission Historic district and two buildings comprise of st. Patricks church and recollect tory and district. Five interconnected buildings that would create a flower market district and three properties received upgraded california register status codes. Six properties were evaluated and potential contributors to previously historic districts including in the 6th Street Lodging h district, the south end district, and townsend district and two additions to the kearney market sutter district. The remaining 26 properties were determined ineligible for listing on the register nor assigned a status code. The recommendations for article 10 and 11 designations were included in your packets. That information has always been posted as part of the area plan. However for today theyre only to be considered as future recommendations. The issue before the commission today is adoption of the context statement and the survey findings. Later in the area as the area plan moves forward for adoption staff will bring the eir and article changes back to you for discussion. I did have one last note which we discussed about the one submitted for 633 folsom. Staff had previously determined that building was a 3cs with args report we have changed the findings to a 6c making it not a resource. This concludes my presentation. I am happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Commissioner pearlman. Yeah, i have one question about the flower market building. Yes. There was so much information so its hard to process it all. Yes. Were those what was the specifics about was it culturally related . I think it was cultural relations and designed by a master architect and had to do with that and the intercultural relationships. Okay thank yous. Any other questions commissioners . Thank you. At this time we will take Public Comment on this item. I have one speaker card for alice light. Hi commissioners. Thank you. I am alice light director of Community Planning at toddco and here to speak in favor of the survey in front of you today. We have been in soma for a very long time and in addition to a very thorough survey of the buildings and the neighborhood this report also includes great information about the filipino and lgbt communities. Those communities have played an Important Role in soma over the years and that history is being lost. In 2011 the western soma Community Planning task force proposed social heritage districts for those groups, and until now those districts have mainly lived on paper. There really arent tools to recognize the social and cultural importance of those groups, but in the recommendation section of the document in front of you today there are some proposals and tools, methodology to document social and culture assets. Those are borrowed from the jay chest, the japan cultural historic heritage and social economic [inaudible] and also from the National Park service, so those are tools that have been used before, so we are very excited to see a social heritage inventory which is what is proposed in the plan or in this document. Were excited to see that developed and it would take staff from the Planning Department to have the budget to work on that, and we hope that happens in 2016 to 2017 because there is so Much Development coming with this plan so it would be great to get that inventory done before the tidal wave comes and i wanted to thank the staff for working with us and with other individuals and groups in the community to make sure that this report represented the soma that we know and love. Thank you. Thank you. Any other member of the public wish to comment on this item . My name is steve jamison. Thank you for letting me speak. I am here to say that as a citizen i support the efforts to develop central soma neighborhood with one exception and thats the parcel of land at fifth and brandon. San francisco tennis club. This may seem strange to come to you,