Will Hunstein Require a Reset? | Smith Debnam Narron Drake S

Will Hunstein Require a Reset? | Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Last month, the entire ARM industry was caught by surprise when the Eleventh Circuit held that a debt collector’s transmittal of information to a third-party letter vendor violated Section 1692c(b) of the FDCPA. 
Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 11648, 994 F.3d 1341 (11
th Cir. 2021).
 While the case will continue to be contested in the Eleventh Circuit, collection agencies and others who rely upon third party vendors have been left to contemplate what comes next.  This article will examine the decision, its immediate impacts, and considerations for the industry as it moves toward implementation of the debt collection rule.

Related Keywords

, Management Services Inc , District Court , Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing , Eleventh Circuit , Management Services , Immediate Impacts , Mean Regarding Collection Agencie Current Use , Third Party , Does Hunstein Align With , Debt Collection , Debt Collection Rule , Its Operations Study , Section Analysis , மேலாண்மை சேவைகள் இன்க் , மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் , பதினொன்றாவது சுற்று , மேலாண்மை சேவைகள் , உடனடியாக தாக்கங்கள் , மூன்றாவது கட்சி , கடன் சேகரிப்பு , கடன் சேகரிப்பு ஆட்சி , பிரிவு பகுப்பாய்வு ,

© 2025 Vimarsana