Page 12 - 1832 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

People do in fact ask why was there the civil war. most ebb historians agree the cause was slaifrmt journalism professor. jason, i'm going to -- i mean. where to start? does it matter he sort of screwed up up the history? to be honest i think he read something about 1832 in which jackson stood strong tot union against an anonymous pamphlet and got it garbled so what's the big deal. >> frederick douglas must have told him the wrong thing because not a lot of people know the work he's doing. to be honest with you, chris, i'm less concerned about the fact that donald trump doesn't know basic 5th ...

Andrew jackson was a great unionist. his mother and his brothers died in the revolution. he believed that their blood had sanctified the union. what i think trump was doing he was conflating the nullification crisis in 1832-33 with the later march to war. and that was a moment where jackson, if he had been a pure states rights slave-owning man without any nuance, he would have actually been more on the side of those who wanted to pick and choose which federal laws they followed. but he believed instead, as he put it in his nullification proclamation, a document by the way that abraham lincoln ...

Worked out? >> for the record, jackson's presidency term ended 24 years before the start of the civil war. jackson died 16 years before the start of the war, the nation's seventh president was a proud slave owner. people do in fact ask why was there the civil war. most ebb historians agree the cause was slaifrmt journalism professor. jason, i'm going to -- i mean. where to start? does it matter he sort of screwed up up the history? to be honest i think he read something about 1832 in which jackson stood strong tot union against an anonymous pamphlet and got it garbled so what's the big deal. >...

What i think trump was doing he was conflating the nullification crisis in 1832-33 with the later march to war. and that was a moment where jackson, if he had been a pure states rights slave-owning man without any nuance, he would have actually been more on the side of those who wanted to pick and choose which federal laws they followed. but he believed instead, as he put it in his nullification proclamation, a document by the way that abraham lincoln called for as he was composing his own first inaugural, he said that the country was one great family and that we had to work out our difference...

What is i think unsettling, if you will, is that -- and with all respect to my friend gene, i think jackson has a lot to teach him if he would pause and think about it for just a moment a two. andrew jackson was a great unionist. his mother and his brothers died in the revolution. he believed that their blood had sanctified the union. what i think trump was doing he was conflating the nullification crisis in 1832-33 with the later march to war. and that was a moment where jackson, if he had been a pure states rights slave-owning man without any nuance, he would have actually been more on the s...