Page 5 - 6th Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

war against hamas as fears of a potential escalation in the region intensifies. plus, russia pounds ukraine's two biggest cities in a new wave of attacks. the assaults are likely to strain nuclear's defenses as the country continues to plead for more military assistance from the u.s. and donald trump is appealing the landmark ruling from maine that disqualified him from the state's primary ballot. later in the program, we'll be joined by maine's secretary of state to talk about her decision there and charlie sykes with his new piece that asks, is disqualifying trump anti-democratic? ...

crucial witnesses in any of these trump probes. i'm talking about the man atop the white house during the january 6th insurrection, and he was chief of staff during that period, chaotic and otherwise of trump's departure when we know the secretive classified documents were taken, stolen, or mishandled. the man you see on the screen is your witness, mark meadows. the "times" has just crossed that news in the last few minutes. we have that news. we've also got this video, providing a rare look at trump council jack smith heading to work today, apparently escorted by security. msnbc new...

trump bowing to fight back after on the ballot in colorado. state supreme court ruling that trump violated the 14th amendment of the constitution because of january 6th. >> the colorado supreme court confirmed that the district court got it right, that he did engage in insurrection. section 3 of the 1st amendment has to apply to the presidency because, if not it's a get out of jail free card. >> literally, jack smith, who would charge donald trump absolutely everything, including jay walking if he could get away with it, didn't even charge donald trump or most of the rioters on janua...

good evening, i'm abby philip in new york. tonight, the special counsel bets big on the supreme court. how big of a bet? well, every single check and balance on all presidents might be at stake. jack smith is wagering that the justices will side with him. he is wagering that the high court will see the wisdom in answering this question sooner rather than later, is donald trump immune from prosecution? now, the special counsel writes like he's running out of time, and in a way, he is. the normal appeals process would give no guarantee that the high court considers the immunity questio...