Page 40 - Addendum News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Sondland's testimony yesterday, he had one version in his deposition. then he had an addendum that completely changed a key point. we were uncertain what to expect yesterday. >> that was pretty devastating. what we did get, but some of those addendums, some of those emissions were also areas that republicans were able to score some points against him as a flawed witness in some regards. i don't think the top line changes. and i think that what fiona hill is going to bring into sharp relief today is separate from the question of abuse of power. look at the foreign policy that was being run. loo...

Secretary pompeo and we were sort of rule nateing about -- ruminating what was going on. johnson said i will call president trump and find out. he obviously had that phone call. i wasn't involved in that phone call. >> okay. you had no reason to disbelieve that wasn't the way it went down, right? >> no reason to disbelieve josh johnson. >> now that you've had some time since your deposition and you've submitted an addendum related to the warsaw get-together with mr. yermak, as you sit here today, are we missing a lot of your communications with the president? >> i haven't had that many communi...

Prosecutor play out a case in the way that you're suggesting adam schiff should do. >> how big is sondland tomorrow? >> huge! this far we've m a null of spoke but no one axle, no one who brings it all home together, who has a zero degree of separation and connection to all these different parts. now, when he first testified, i would have said he's going to take a dive on all of this. then he filed the addendum. if you're ambassador sondland, i got to go to and arguably, they found him guilty on all counts. arguably he knew they were going to find he is and he wasn't going to have that come out...

Weeks. that's a pretty big change. back now with our legal and political team. jen psaki, what's interesting about his amended statement is it still doesn't really say, you know, i said they wouldn't get aid unless they did biden investigation. so there's sort of room for him to still say, well, you know, the investigations we have been discussing, we know what they were, but he didn't say it himself. >> that's right, anderson. reading his addendum, it doesn't answer a lot of the questions that weren't answered in his first testimony that have been conflicted by other people testifying. and hi...

Seemingly at odds with his addendum where he says that did take place. and i'm the guy who delivered the message as john was just reading. september 1 to yermak who's the assistant to the ukraine president. the only way i see he can get out of that is to say, yes, aid was conditioned but it had nothing to do with the bidens. it was about ukraine investigating corruption generally. where i now go back to what i've been saying here consistently. the biggest problem for the president is his repeated saying no quid pro quo, no quid pro quo. because all of this evidence together paints a picture of...