Adjudicating Conflicts News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

She was a terrific judge. she's fair. she's very calm. she's not ideological at all, so she's a very good choice here on the merits. i also think it was smart of judge wood to pick someone not on either of party's lists, because she could be said to favor one side or the other if she did that. the other thing that's great about judge jones -- and none of the seven people on the parties' lists had this characteristic -- she was a judge, so she's used to adjudicating conflicts. she's used to making a call on privileged documents. but she also was on the defense side for the last five years, so s...

It's her job to go through the documents and decide on whether the items are privileged or not. the parties will help her by making claims about what is and what isn't privileged, and she'll ultimately make that decision. she was on the bench for 17 years. i had many cases in front of her. she was a terrific judge. she's fair. she's very calm. she's not ideological at all, so she's a very good choice here on the merits. i also think it was smart of judge wood to pick someone not on either of party's lists, because she could be said to favor one side or the other if she did that. the other thin...