Page 37 - Advisement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

From steve bannon but not hope hicks and not others. >> did the white house intervene? as we understand it, the republicans have shut down these asks for subpoenas in real time. what is the reason they're taking it under advisement? was there any discussion about future interviews and what might be still forthcoming in terms of the investigation? >> it wasn't i think a function at all of this being getaway day. we had ample representations during the interview. we still haven't gotten an answer, frankly, on whether we will move forward on con temperature with steve bannon. they have an quiet s...

Investigation. whether there were actions to impede the investigation, obstruct the investigations is also very relevant. so it was a meritless objection. >> did the white house intervene mr. lewandowski not to answer these questions? >> i don't want to get into the specifics of conversations. all i can say, vis-a-vis whether the committee will insist on getting answers, that is being taken under advisement by the majority. i think they are struggling to determine how if at all to distinguish between these witnesses. in my view they should be treated the same way. we should not insist on answe...

Biggest campaign you can join, a presidential campaign. >> as the president said, she said she knew nothing about politics before he decided to make her -- do you believe the committee should subpoena her? i mean because she basically did not answer, as many people have before this committee, she refused to answer questions basically citing executive privilege, as i understand. >> yeah, she did cite executive privilege, but it went beyond that. even when there was a question that it was clear that the answer would not be covered by executive privilege, i saw something yesterday that i hadn't s...

>> was she in there with an attorney today. >> she had a few attorneys with her. >> what is it like when she deems out of bounds? what happens? >> the answers, you know, that they would take it under advisement or they weren't going to answer the question which i thought was incredibly arrogant to say we're just not going to answer. we asked why? we're not going to answer. >> i'm confused here. it seems that her conversations with the president in the white house are actually things that plausibly you can make an executive privilege argument to cover. >> sure. >> but that just would come from ...

House judiciary committee member dale issa next. >> i think the f.b.i. should look at it before it is released and i have provided that counsel to chairman nunes. i think he has taken that under advisement. today, the new new york is sparking innovation. you see it in the southern tier with companies that are developing powerful batteries that make everything from cell phones to rail cars more efficient. which helps improve every aspect of advanced rail technology. all with support from a highly-educated workforce and vocational job training. across new york state, we're building the new new y...