the jurors were instructed to answer the questions on the questionnaires, and he really only gave the parties a half hour. some judges give the parties hours or even days to ask questions of the jurors. so he s moved quickly, but i think the one of the consequences of that is that they don t have time to delve as deeply into issues and so now we see where there s a break in the trial, we see the parties coming up with some issues once they ve had an opportunity to research these jurors a little bit more deeply. and so joyce, do you see any red flags on this jury for either side? well, i think one of the important things we re seeing, ana, is that we don t know as much about these jurors as we might in a typical case because the judge is using an anonymous jury procedure, and we can all understand the need for that. so if to carol s point, there s not only a lack of public information that s afternoonly amplified, i think
step alerting congress to something that ended up up bog a nothing burger in terms of that batch of e-mails found on anthony wiener s communitier. it took them a mere week after obtaining a search warrant to conclude that s e-mails were largely redundant. why he wouldn t have taken that step before he sent a letter to congress given the explosive exact it had, i think it should have done good afternoonly. the inspector general out of all of these agencies is going to be one of these places where hopefully they have a shining moment over the next four years because no matter how the trump administration seeks to run these agencies with the controversial cabinet picks they are appointing these inspectors are independent and their job is to follow the facts wherefore they lead, do oversight and due diligence.