Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20161015:13:12:00
You do? is that the totality michael isikoff of the charge against hillary for having enabled in the broderick case? >> in the broderick case, yes. and it is by its nature am b ambiguous. you don't know what hillary was referring to if she said it exactly the way broderick recounts it today. it's a data point. it's something that has raised questions but, you know, how far it goes is hard to say. i mean we don't know what hillary clinton knew about what juanita broderick said her husband did to her. we don't know how much information was passed. i mean based on everything we know about the cli...