Page 33 - Answer It News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Dug up some other information when he was reporting this story back in september. christine o'donnell ran against joe biden in 2008 and lost that election. gary found that in march of 2009 when o'donnell was between campaigns she wrote this, $750 check to the landlord of the house she was renting using campaign funds. and marked the check "fundraising expense, expense reimbursement" she wrote another $750 check to the landlord in april 2009 as well. when gary tuchman tried to ask o'donnell about the rental discrepancies, this is what happened. >> reporter: may ski you that one question you pro...

O'donnell who increasingly appears to be trying to run a stealth campaign not answering questions from reporters and today not even telling reporters where her campaign event was taking place. why would she do that? well, take a look. this is what happened last night when our reporter, gary tuchman went to an o'donnell event and tried to ask her one question about allegations she spent campaign money on personal expenses after the campaign was over, which is a violation of federal election law. >> reporter: may i ask you the one question you promised you'd answer? >> i did answer it. >> report...

Are you going to sue her? >> the salahis. can i answer the question? >> lisa answer the question. >> answer it, lisa. if the salahis sued everybody that's called them names, they would literally be suing millions of people. i just ask people to look at the facts, look at the e-mails that have been in the public record since september. >> quickly, one more time, lisa. do you believe they're in the clear in terms of federal criminal exposure? >> i -- i don't want to make predictions, especially about the future. it's been eight months. the u.s. attorney has not charged them with any crime. >> ok...

Are you going to sue her? >> the salahis. can i answer the question? >> lisa answer the question. >> answer it, lisa. if the salahis sued everybody that's called them names, they would literally be suing millions of people. i just ask people to look at the facts, look at the e-mails that have been in the public record since september. >> quickly, one more time, lisa. do you believe they're in the clear in terms of federal criminal exposure? >> i -- i don't want to make predictions, especially about the future. it's been eight months. the u.s. attorney has not charged them with any crime. >> ok...

Nickel. are you going to sue her? >> the salahis. can i answer the question? >> lisa answer the question. >> answer it, lisa. if the salahis sued everybody that's called them names, they would literally be suing millions of people. i just ask people to look at the facts, look at the e-mails that have been in the public record since september. >> quickly, one more time, lisa. do you believe they're in the clear in terms of federal criminal exposure? >> i -- i don't want to make predictions, especially about the future. it's been eight months. the u.s. attorney has not charged them with any crim...