Live Breaking News & Updates on Anti Muslim Animus
Stay updated with breaking news from Anti muslim animus. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Show tonight. you met with a nominee last week, who tweeted a photo thanking you and others for continuing to support him. are you surprised at all that a non controversial nominee for a relatively low profile position is being treated like this by the republican party? at this point, i am not surprised. if you asked me this a few months ago, i would ve been surprised. but there s been a consistent, and i will say it, a very racist approach to nominees of color and the biden administration, where time after time, republicans continue to stall, prevent or as police strange questions of the nominees. but [inaudible] let alone, have the vote. and do you think islamophobia, anti-muslim animus has a lot to do with this? they came out saying, anti-muslim animus was driving this unprecedented action against him, of course we are seeing right now from the gop, openly bigoted rhetoric being ....
Rethink his position on banning muslims from entering the country. he answered, no. a month later at a rally in south carolina, trump told an apocryphal story about united states general john pershing killing a large group of muslim insurgents in the philippines with bullets dipped in pigs blood in the early 1900s. in march 2016, he expressed his belief that islam hates us. he said, we re having problems with muslims coming into this country. the justice continues, despite several opportunities to do so, president trump has never disavowed any of his prior statements about islam. instead he has continued to make remarks that a reasonable observer would view as an unrelenting attack on the muslim religion and its followers. taking all the relevant evidence together, a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was driven primarily by anti-muslim animus, rather than by the government s ....
Decision, it s like the poor justice, who s a decent, straightforward guy, has twisted himself into a pretzel. because he quotes over and over again the anti-islam anti-muslim statements of president trump and candidate trump andalling a muslim ban and a way to exclude muslims in the country. over and over again, quoting trump saying that. and then it s weird, he has to say, but we don t believe the president saying this reall makes it this way. when, in fact, it was clearly motivated by anti-muslim animus. as justice sotomayor said. so when you have a chief justice of the supreme court that has to spin around and say, here s all the things he said, but we re going to t to decide it as if the president s own views were not motivating the president s order. and that s weird and i deeply ....
Religious neutrality. it leaves undisturbed a policy first advertised openly as she ques here a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states because the policy now masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns. she said the repackaging does little to cleanse presidential prok lowmation of the appearance of discrimination based on the evidence in the record a reasonable observer would say it was motivated by anti-muslim animus. they turn a blind eye to the pain and suffering the proclamation inflicts upon individuals. the statements of some of his surrogates saying he was going to have some type of quote muslim ban or shut down the ....
Does little to cleanse presidential proclamation number 9645 of the appearance of discrimination that the president s words have created. based on the evidence in the record, a reasonable observer would conclude that the proclamation was motivated by anti-muslim animus. and with that let s bring in our panel. byron york, chief political correspondent of the washington examiner . mollie hemingway, senior editor at the federalist and charles lane, opinion writer for the washington post . significant ruling today? it was. this was all we were talking about in the first few months of the trump administration and it should have been a slam dunk for white house and the fact that it is not it was not is really amazing. john roberts is correct. it was clearly within the scope of the president s constitutional powers and the biggest argument against it was that even though it was a legitimate presidential power, that this president donald trump had exercised it with impure motive and ....