Apprehension Charge Documents News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Such respect, to dr. resknick, he examined him for one purpose, and one purpose only it was for competency? >> correct. >> competency is different than sanity at the time of the act? >> correct. >> and you reported in your report based upon materials in review, what materials did you actually review? >> i reviewed, as i mentioned at the beginning of my testimony, the transcripts of the recordings. i reviewed the competency document. i reviewed court documents related to the apprehension charge documents. i was asked to -- i wrote this letter yesterday. this was not a formal exam, obviously and...

That was not the referral by the >> well, you know, most of the court. it was for competency, correct? testimony and the details today >> yes. >> competency is different, just showed how heinous this doctor, than sanity at the time crime was, and i agree that this of the act. is it not? just tell me yes or no. >> correct. >> okay. and you put in your report, testimony is used so that the based upon the materials on prosecution can have a sealed review, but you don't outline type deal here and clearly for us what materials did you support on the record why castro actually review. is receiving a...