horseracing. thank you. afternoon. i m trace gallagher in for martha maccallum and this is the story. south carolina senators tim scott a potential ep candidate is here live has former president trump whittles down his list and announces when he s revealing his pickton clay travis and hillary clinton equating the day with the 2024 election. but first hunter biden may take a stand in his gun trial following an emotional day in court. his daughter naomi testifying she never saw her father do drugs when asked if she knows what that would look like, she answered i guess not. we are told the first lady who again sat in the courtroom appeared upset after naomi s testimony. president biden saying this about his son s legal battle. watch. will you accept the jury s outcome, the verdict the matter what is? yes. have you ruled out a pardon for your son? justice correspondent live outside the courthouse in wilmington delaware. david good afternoon. good afternoon. jurors sent
are getting worse. i want to put up the fox power ranking because you look at the numbers and look at the border. nobody is fooled. you see trump is up by 18 points on border issues over joe biden and it s not because people do not think he s got something to do with it. i have said arizona is a state of most worried about is a democrat that went red to blue-and-white michael back to read. simply because immigration even though abortion is second in that state among voters across the board. but i find it interesting the former president uses the words weak and pathetic. if you go back to 2018 the former president himself to the very similar thing the president biden is doing with the executive order and what he did is attempted to band the asylum entry. he didn t have numerical limits on what happened. the courts shut it down and the reason is both former president trump and current president biden are looking at the ina and saying we are citing section 212208 protects people unserer
asylum was never meant to alleviate all problems, even all serious problems, that people face every day all over the world. laura: common sense interpretation, no? the move was needed because asylum-seekers were abusing the system, aided by a lot of leftist ngos. migrants began parroting lines about gang violence and domestic violence to establish this expanded credible fear category because they didn t want to return to their homelands. judge sullivan s opinion today, it s back to business as usual. pre-trump the way it used to be. the judge not only by the way demands the administration revert to the old rules of asylum entry but further he instructed that the government return to the united states the plaintiffs who were unlawfully deported and to provide them with new credible fear determinations consistent with the immigration laws. would you like a mint on your
particular social group or political opinion. asylum was never meant to alleviate all problems, even all serious problems, that people face every day all over the world. laura: common sense interpretation, no? the move was needed because asylum-seekers were abusing the system, aided by a lot of leftist ngos. migrants began parroting lines about gang violence and domestic violence to establish this expanded credible fear category because they didn t want to return to their homelands. judge sullivan s opinion today, it s back to business as usual. trump the way it used to be. the judge not only by the way demands the administration reversed to the old rules of asylum entry but further he instructed that the government returned to the united states the plaintiffs were unlawfully deported and to provide them with new credible fear determinations consistent with the immigration laws.
he clearly has the legal authority under section 212 of the immigration and nationality act that congress gave the president. he has the authority in the interest of national security to suspend asylum entry or to add restrictions and so he sees this as a national security threat many of us do so his action right now is perfectly appropriate and we support it. trish: okay so there is this incoming government in mexico that says no, we haven t struck any kind of asylum deal. does it even matter? do we even need any kind of areas deal with mexico? can t we say all right, we re changing our policy this is how it s going to be? we can. now we re very compassionate nation but we re also a nation of laws and so we ve got to enforce those laws. we want to allow people refuge when they re seeking legitimate prosecution when they re in legitimate fear, for their family s lives or their own lives that s the way our legal standard has been over the years , but its been abused in