Stay updated with breaking news from Audit Division. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
FAIRFIELD — Six possible welfare fraud investigations resulted from 11 whistleblower complaints issued by Solano County employees. There were 11 welfare fraud complaints in all, but five were found not to have merit, according to a report released Thursday by the county administration. “From J
For the News-Register CHARLESTON — A 2020 law requiring state agencies exempt from oversight by the West Virginia purchasing watchdog to submit reports on their procedures was ignored, and part of the law could hinder agencies during states of emergency. The Legislature’s Post Audit Division released a report Friday reviewing state agency compliance with House Bill 4042. The 2020 law requires state agencies exempt from some or all of state purchasing requirements to adopt procedural rules. The purpose of the law was to require state agencies with certain exemptions to make public their pu...
sadams@newsandsentinel.com CHARLESTON — A 2020 law requiring state agencies exempt from oversight by the West Virginia purchasing watchdog to submit reports on their procedures was ignored, and part of the law could hinder agencies during states of emergency. The Legislature’s Post Audit Division released a report Friday reviewing state agency compliance with House Bill 4042. The 2020 law requires state agencies exempt from some or all of state purchasing requirements to adopt procedural rules. The purpose of the law was to require state agencies with certain exemptions to make public the...
CHARLESTON — A 2020 law requiring state agencies exempt from oversight by the West Virginia purchasing watchdog to submit reports on their procedures was igno
pro se; Articles 28 and 29 (by Chris Doyle) This is the second order issued in this case. My tongue-in-cheek write-up of the first order may be found here. In essence, Petitioner thinks he is not required to pay sales or use tax on a truck and trailer he purchased and/or registered in New York. Petitioner’s primary basis for the claimed exemption is that he is a tax-exempt “Moorish-American.” I have read all of Articles 28 and 29 and have not found anything supporting Petitioner’s claimed exemption. But maybe if he were the ambassador to the US (or the UN) from Moor-America and the tr...