Bad Facebook News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

It's the truth, but they have the weird moralistic puritanical strain where they don't want certain images being showed on their site. if these president clintonublications don't think long-term, facebook will be a de facto editor controlling what people see or don't, they're dreaming. >> so brief answers, would you make a deal with facebook? >> like i said you know, we don't rely -- we're not a big mass media publication. we speak to a very small, very intelligent audience that we think really you know, moves money around tech and controls the world. so we don't rely on huge social stream and...

On facebook they never come to your site, yes, you get some mad revenue and recognition, but facebook down the line could change the terms and make it a lot more onerous and everybody will be trapped in zuckerberg's world. >> and facebook will change the terms. we know they will. they it rate on their terms and fees constantly. this is why facebook was comfortable giving up so much concessions to these guys going into it because now that they have this group of publishers they can strong arm all the other big publishers to coming in because they're going to use the fact that yurss see these st...

Message? >> are you concerned at all that given the allegations that may overshadow your message? >> i have been in this business 52 years and i will -- i have never seen anything like this. reality is a situation and i cannot speak. >> one of strangest television moments i have ever seen and as someone would grew up laughing with him i have to say really, by is that the best you can do? you oh us an actual response to the awful allegations. that is it for "media buzz," i am howard kurtz we hope you luke our facebook page, we post a lot of original content. you might get a response from me. al...

Outlets and facebook really really tripped over themselves to make it look like none of those doomsday scenarios were coming true. so on the facebook side they gave up huge concessions to the media publishers to look like hey, we're just trying to get more people to read your stuff at a quicker load time. nothing else nothing to see here. and on the publisher side they wanted their readers to know that they weren't all going to be quizzes. "the new york times,"",,"",," "national geographic," all of these publications put out very long cabal "j" journalism pieces with the exception of buzz feed...

And people reading your stories on facebook they never come to your site, yes, you get some mad revenue and recognition, but facebook down the line could change the terms and make it a lot more onerous and everybody will be trapped in zuckerberg's world. >> and facebook will change the terms. we know they will. they it rate on their terms and fees constantly. this is why facebook was comfortable giving up so much concessions to these guys going into it because now that they have this group of publishers they can strong arm all the other big publishers to coming in because they're going to use ...