Live Breaking News & Updates on Battle Of Narratives
Stay updated with breaking news from Battle of narratives. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Of the entire region, which they believe would also spill over in a positive way in the red sea. the ceasefire clearly is the sticking point, but when you listen to western capitals, they want to keep the two issues separate the gaza war and the threat to global shipping. are you saying from where you re sitting, the sorts of things you re hearing that simply isn t flying? that s right. i mean, you seem to have a battle of narratives at the moment where the us, the uk and the predominantly western nations that have joined this coalition and operation prosperity guardian are trying, as you said, to separate the two issues and to paint the houthi attacks in the red sea as being unconnected to the war in gaza. the houthis and the iranians, of course, have conducted these attacks very clearly under the pretext that these are meant to raise the cost for us and uk and, of course, also for israel and to attempt to bring ....
Pathway. region prefer a de-escalation athwa . . . , , region prefer a de-escalation athwa. . ,. ., , pathway. the ceasefire is clearly the sticking pathway. the ceasefire is clearly the sticking point, pathway. the ceasefire is clearly the sticking point, but pathway. the ceasefire is clearly the sticking point, but western l the sticking point, but western capitals want to keep the two issues separate, the gaza war and the threat to global shipping. are you saying from where you are setting, the sorts of things you are hearing, that simply is not flying? that is riuht. we that simply is not flying? that is right. we seem that simply is not flying? that is right. we seem to that simply is not flying? that is right. we seem to have - that simply is not flying? that is right. we seem to have a - that simply is not flying? that is right. we seem to have a battle| that simply is not flying? that is l right. we seem to have a battle of narratives at the moment where the us, u ....
But for mark meadows in particular, his role was not political and it certainly ãã the role of the white house chief of staff is to not do illegal things. owner how strong this argument actually ended up being. gift establishes mark meadows burden to prove, right? is acting as his official duties and his official call to defense. i think he s an uphill battle here, recommend he s going to harp on he was just scheduling the meeting. wisconsin second secretary on behalf of the president for this was just his job. among the prosecutors, your job is not to overturn the election, right? in that spot part of the chief of staff s department responsibility. i think you re getting here battle of narratives in this hearing. mark meadows was focusing on what he was told to do as chief of staff and schedule focal meetings. diego said you were looking for 11,887 votes. throughout the motions hearing as well as the trial. i think we can never really ããlet s just play that sound because you c ....
Limit the amount of testimony that is actually presented to the jury once it comes back in the courtroom. dana: jonathan serrie, thank you. bill: paul morrow is with us and founder of ops desk.org. the state s theory on the case is the reason why they believe he committed these murders trying to distract attention from his financial problems. if the judge has to let it in. we have a battle of narratives. the defense narrative is the prosecution rushed to judgment and didn t do due diligence to look for other suspects and that no father would ever do such a thing. it s why he had coming out of the box gave a graphic opening statement. the prosecution s narrative. this is crunch time now. this is where the narrative resides, is that the accused had been living a very slipping down life. opioid addict stealing from his ....
Otherwise providing the necessary means for the girls to be abused by mr. epstein. the verdict very significant. joey, i want to dig deeper into the jury s process. while we were waiting, they requested a lot of notes. it seemed to be a pro tracted conversation they were having. what can you tell us about what you think was going on in the jury room and how they got to the verdict. st i think the process involved, really making an assessment as to what was true. remember, in any courtroom, you have a battle of narratives. this case was no different than that. what were the narratives battling about here. remember that the defense planted seeds about. this is about these young girls, now women, having faulty memories. the defense even bringing in an expert to make that, that you could have false recollection, things imbedded in your memory that change over the time. ....