Page 10 - Benghazi Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Terrorist strike, even though that wasn't how the obama administration initially described it publicly. representative peter king of new york said petraeus had briefed the house intelligence committee on september 14, and he does not recall petraeus being so positive at the time that it was a terrorist attack. he thought all along that he made it clear there was terrorist involvement, king said. that was not my recollection. so senator feinstien, did petraeus contradict himself or has he contradicted the white house's version of events? >> we have a transcript of that meeting on that day. and ...

Exit polls when asked whether his economic policies favored the wealthy, 53% to 34% of people said yes. and i think that obama came into that meeting with a tremendous amount of confidence and energy, that he had put the question before the american people, 60% of the american people said yes, as part of this fiscal cliff deal, taxes have to gun on to ue wealthy, and i think he'll get a good deal. >> i think they'll get a punting deal. but romney, he made an unfortunate comment, but the biggest problem he had was the republican primary. that is what is driving the brand to a disaster right now...

Government back significantly? >> i'm not if what it means is that we're going to raise taxes and we're not going to decrease any spending. if you remember that moment in the primary where they asked all 10 candidates -- >> the 10 to one, right. >> i would have answered the question differently. i would have raised my hand and said, yes, i am willing to do it if the $10 in spending cuts happen today. because what happens in washington, d.c., is we do increase in taxes today. and we promise that there's going to be spending cuts 10 years from now. and it never happens. it didn't happen under re...

>> and just as a counterpoint here, and again, we get along well. we may disagree on this issue. but we get along well on many, many issues. but what was said and as i conclude the course of that investigation was that at some point, that those so-called talking points, in other words, the narrative of how we would call this event, went up to what's called a deputy's meeting. when asked, there was no one in the professional intelligence community could tell us who changed what. so that -- there goes the disconnect. so the intelligence community says this was a terrorist act. >> why didn't we c...

But we get along well on many, many issues. but what was said and as i conclude the course of that investigation was that at some point, that those so-called talking points, in other words, the narrative of how we would call this event, went up to what's called a deputy's meeting. when asked, there was no one in the professional intelligence community could tell us who changed what. so that -- there goes the disconnect. so the intelligence community says this was a terrorist act. >> why didn't we call it what it was? that's what i don't get. >> that's a great question. >> why not just call it ...