Unexplained exclusion of sci-fi works for top award raises issue of Chinese censorship
All four writers have said that they have not received official reasons for their exclusion. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Stay updated with breaking news from Best Dramatic Presentation. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
All four writers have said that they have not received official reasons for their exclusion. Read more at straitstimes.com.
Chengdu 2023: A Bittersweet Symphony of a Worldcon I'll take you down the only road I've ever been down Been down Ever been down Ever been down Ever been down Ever been down Have you ever been down? Have you ever been down? Have you ever been down? ++ “Bittersweet Symphony” by Richard Ashcroft of
TL;DR SUMMARY: The differences between the redacted and the final 2023 Hugo ballots involved three items and were due to rules applications as explained in the 2023 Hugo Award Stats Final report. The “ineligibles” were not on the redacted ballot, either. If you don’t know what the redacted ballot was, keep reading. SUDDENLY LAST SUMMER.
The 2023 Hugo Award Stats Final report posted today on the official Hugo Awards website revealed that the Chengdu Worldcon’s Hugo award subcommittee made many startling and sometimes unexplained rulings. R. F. Kuang’s novel Babel, winner of the 2023 Nebula and Locus Awards, was ruled “not eligible” without explanation, even though it had the third most
From nominees being mysteriously deemed ineligible to odd data curves, the 2023 Hugo Award voting data just released from Chengdu Worldcon has many in the fantasy and sci-fi community in an uproar.