Stay updated with breaking news from Betsy quinn. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
up and rule on what is team trump s most brazen claims that the documents trump horded in mar-a-lago in a bathroom, a bedroom and a basement, documents containing some of this nation s most secret and protected national security secrets actually belonged rightfully to trump because the presidential records act, or the pra. special counsel writing this, the court should be wlaer at the outset that trump s entire effort to rely on the pra is not based on any facts, it is a post hock justification that was concocted more than a year after he left the white house, importantly, trump has never, never represented to this court that he, in fact, designated the classified documents as personal. he made no such claim in this motion to dismiss in his reply, or at the hearing on march 14th, 2024. despite every opportunity, and every incentive to do so. and the reason is simple. he never did so. now, here s why smith wants to settle this particular issue once and for all right n ....
wallace. ever since charged were handed down against donald trump, the ex president has seen returning to the white house as his best defense. no one is more aware of this than jack smith. jack smith asked the supreme court to rule on donald trump s bid to have the charges ruled out because the alleged crimes took place while he was president. this is not new. judge tanya chutkan rejected that claim and trump appealed. jack smith is asking the supreme court to leap frog the appeals court and settle the matter once and for all. the special counsel s move setting up the first, but maybe not the last time, the supreme courtla a role in the united states versus donald trump. prosecutors say, quote, this caserents a fundamental question at the heart ofur democracy. whether a fmer president is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed ile in office or is constitutionally protect from federal prosecution when he s been impeached by the house, but not co ....
tonight on all in i m now very close. we could bring some of these hostages home. a potential deal for hostages. it s not going to be done until it s done. tonight, the delicate negotiation going on in israel, it will take some time to get some of the hamas hostages home. then, the latest on the gag order against the ex president as authoritarianism keeps spreading beyond trump. i will rain hell on washington, dc. plus, the reason why the polls are so tight and why inflation just ain t what it used to be. we went to go buy a turkey today. it was $90 for a turkey! when all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. we are having some big news tonight. it has been 45 days since the october 7th hamas attack on israel, which precipitated the nearly constant bombardment of gaza by the israeli army and a nearly full scale ground invasion. and today at this hour there is a glimmer of hope that some of the over 200 host ....
white house starts right now. hey, everyone. 4:00 in new york i m in for nicolle wallace. justice and accountability. more than a year after a harrowing attack that shocked this country, the ongoing political violence at the forefront, the jury found david depape guilty on counts of attempted kidnap taing of a federal official and assaulting a family member of a federal official. talking husband of nancy pelosi, paul pelosi, with a hammer in their home back in october of last year. depape faces life in prison. nancy pelosi they are deeply grateful for outpouring of prayers and warm wishes for mr. pelosi across country during this difficult time. the pelosi family is proud he densated extraordinary bravery and demonstrated in the courtroom this week. he felt in immediate danger when depape arrived at the doorstep in the middle of the night. the nbc news, the door opened a very large man came in with a hammer in one hand, zip ties in the other and he said, where s n ....
new york times also notes this, quote, in making her decision, the judge also denied a request by ump s lawyers to freeze the gag order for what could have been a considerably longer period. saying it can remain in effect as the federal appeals court in washington reviews it. judge chutkan s move is the latest chapter but has become a protracted legal battle between special counsel jack smith and donald trump with incredibly high stakes. at its heart is this question, will a defendant with one of if not the biggest megaphone in the world be subject to any of the same rules as any of the rest of us if we were criminal defendants in the united states? to that question judge chutkan says yes and her ruling she writes the first amendment rights of participants in criminal proceedings must yield when necessary to the orderly administration of justice. the judge also rejecting the notion that her gag order was too vague to be enforceable. pointing out that donald trump hims ....