Page 21 - Binding Agreement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

We negotiate wages and when we heard the white house say by cutting the corporate tax rate to 20% workers we get a 4000-dollar wage increase we reacted in the logical asked. we sent a letter and attached that was a contract proposal. it said if the corporate tax rate was reduced to 20%, every employee in the bargaining unit will receive a 4000-dollar wage increase. this is in the company's control. the white house is sane and leaders are saying that if this would take effect this is what would happen. we want that primus in writing and in the binding agreement. >> steve: that's a creative resp...

We are a labor unions and we negotiate lower wages so when we heard the white house say that by cutting the corporate tax rate at 20 percent workers would get an average of $4,000 wage increase we reacted logical fashion to send a letter to eight key employers it was a contract proposal that said of the corporate tax rate is reduced at 20% every employee in thehe bargaining unit will receive a $4,000 wage increase. this is entirely within the of companies controlled the white house says and lawmakers say of this tax rate would take effect this is what would happen so we just want that promise ...

Because by saying they're violating the spirit of the deal, well, everybody has their own interpretation of what a spirit of the deal is. but if every country in the world decided that they're going to start linking all these issues like this and an row gating deals willy nily, an row gating promises they have made you would have no international order. this goes far beyond the iran deal. this is a question of whether the united states is going to keep its word on a deal that it admits the other party has not broke ep. >> mike, what do you make of fareed's perspective? >> first of all, preside...

It couldn't even zsh it was never even signed by anyone. the iranians insist this is not any kind of binding agreement themselves. let's not turn there there's into a pillar of internal order. second let's talk -- >> might be ke, if i may majori american didn't vote for donald trump. but we follow the rules we have. the rules are the president can make a deal like this. if you want to talk about whether the majority of the country was behind it well the majority of the america wasn't behind donald trump. >> donald trump won the white house by the electoral system. what trump has done here as o...

On our investment in california. >> tucker: because california doesn't have a right to do that because it is a state. you are basically creating your own foreign policy. when that right is constitutionally reserved for the federal government. that used to be obvious, but california is so high on its own fumes that they lost sight of that somehow. >> no, but this is a nonbinding agreement, again. counties and states have already been doing this for decades now. there is nothing new about this. if he had signed something that said it was a binding agreement, you and i would be in total agreement...