Blanket Designation News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

It's my understanding that they were in process through the national are archives, not partisan lawyers. republicans agree. 90% of elena kagan's white house records were publicly available and could be used freely by any member. by contrast, the committee has only 7% of brett kavanaugh's white house records. only 4% of those are available to the public. no centage or committee rule grants the chairman unilateral to designate documents committee confidential. so, i have no idea how that stamp "committee confidential" got on these documents. i sent a letter on august 10th, 2018, objecting to the...

Documents were processed through the national archives, not private partisan lawyers and republicans agreed. 99% of kagan's white house records were publicly available and could be used freely by any member. by contrast, the committee has only 7% of brett kavanaugh's white house records. and only 4% of those are available to the public. no senate or committee rule grants the chairman unilateral authority to designate documents committee confidential. so i have no idea how that stamp committee confidential got on these documents. i sent a letter on august 10th, 2018, objecting to the blanket de...

It's nuanced concern about abortion. you and i know the issue and the moral question there. this case, where do you see it going? where do you think it should go? >> well, i do think it is really complicated. i do not agree with those on either side who say it's obvious. however, i don't understand how you could give some kind of blanket designation to businesses that are for profit becoming, you know, being regarded as people with religious views. i mean, if you did that, i really do think it's important to see where would you draw the line, even if you only limited it as pete was saying earl...

It's nuanced concern about abortion. you and i know the issue and the moral question there. this case, where do you see it going? where do you think it should go? >> well, i do think it is really complicated. i do not agree with those on either side who say it's obvious. however, i don't understand how you could give some kind of blanket designation to businesses that are for profit becoming, you know, being regarded as people with religious views. i mean, if you did that, i really do think it's important to see where would you draw the line, even if you only limited it as pete was saying earl...

It's my munderstanding those wee processed through the national archives, not private partisan lawyers, and republicans agreed. 99% of the white house records were publically available and could be used freely by any member. by contrast, the committee has only 7% of brett kavanaugh's white house records and only 4% of those are available to the public. no senate or committee rule grants the chairman unilateral authority to designate documents committee confidential. so i have no idea how that stamp committee confidential got on these documents. i sent a letter on august 10th, 2018, objecting t...