thank you for talking to us. thank you for your concern. on the clippers owner here is charles barkley: he has to be suspended. if someone wants to be racist that is there thing. but when you take jobs and economic things from people that crosses the line. we cannot have an nba owner discriminateing against the league. we are a black league. many are calling for sterling to be thrown out. jim gray is here. and i am i am read thing by-laws that govern the players doesn t mean they can force him out. if that is the case what do you
officials, including paterno, covered it up and i think that s what s so disturbing here and so problematic for paterno s legacy. there s also, michael isikoff, anxiety, i m sure, as to the future of the football program? absolutely. and that really is the next shoe that could drop here. you go back and look at the letter that the ncaa sent to penn state back in november when this first when sandusky was arrested and it s very strong and pointed and asked very tough questions about what kind of institutional controls that penn state had over the figures of the football program and also whether penn state officials involved adhered to all ncaa by-laws, including those requiring ethics and honesty and there s one that specifically cited in that letter about moral values. and the need to uphold moral values when you are teaching
fence as staples. paterno has passed. sandusky is in the slammer. curley and shultz are being prosecuted. arguably spanier soon will be prosecuted. and those who were culpable in this are getting their just due. i don t want to see the merchant and state college who makes money because he does well on saturdays because of football suffer because that would seem fundamentally unfair. and i think that s exactly the issue that supporters of penn state are going to be raising here. but on the other side of the coin, you re going to get people saying if the ncaa doesn t act in a situation like this after specifically citing, remember, its bylaws about ethics and integrity and moral values, when is it going to act? in enforcing those bylaws. here you have the most senior officials in charge of penn state program by their own
that s the key word here. back to the question. the question did not ask nationally here, just the word sold, as you see. so was the game show wrong? should the couple get a second chance? will brittney poison gabe s dinner tonight? no. of course we re choking. we hope not. but this also happened in the show s british version. this couple you see here lost half a million dollars. but then the game show admitted its error and gave the coupleal second chance, reinstating the money. at least gabe and brittney, in the u.s. version, if they were able to walk away with $80,000 to the next step. i don t know. i m going to bring jonathan and boris back in. should they just give them, jonathan, the $800,000? i mean, if they re right, they re right. yeah. i just caught the last part of your question. but i m assuming that you re talking about those poor people who lost that they got it right. they got it right. isn t there something in the rules, the by-laws or something that would