Page 7 - Bye Election News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The u.s. government itself has and wants to keep secret what'sh your understanding of what government officials believe about these objects? esjects?well, the sources that t are telling me they just don't know what these things are. you know, there's a proportion of these cases, three hundredg and sixty six in thisly classified report that's going to congres s probably tomorrow that are explained that chinese dronesr , for example, but the unexplained ones, they just have no clue becausemoving these things are moving in ways thatp, we just don't understand at hypersaline speeds and then they j...

The systemoplenmen is not corruo and to do that with transparency. >> why does nobody say that? it's as easy as that.g to hid you've got nothing to hide. open ue,p the books.th that's what i ask you. two years ago this time last year, we were told that glenn and couldn't win it and with transparency, i believe, helped him win in virginia. simply 90% of the polls that there were people therethis re watch the counting and procedures. this is a constitutional republic. have you got nothing to hide?ifh poll watchers, there should be no problemople with poll watchers, poll workers, people they're o...

You're encouraged to you'reh encouraged you because it'ths your government. there's no such thingpeech. as election denying in a freere society. >> allowed t it's called free sd you're allowed to say it if youe think it, period. in our media, which exists to defend free speech, is doingt its best day after day to shutse it down. >> how dare you raise any. questions about next week's midterms? e they telling youwhy are they ? it's ominous. here's msnbc's ali velshi making explicit watch as heblicn explains that if you i vote fory a republicanlv in pennsylvania, doug mastrianni, you're destroyin...

Out of everything. yes, 50 ministers resigned. i would say the thing that really tipped the balance for him was that bye election in june. that got everybody's attention. they're politicians, after all. yes, there are moral reasons to get rid of him, but if the public turns against him after a really overwhelming victory three years ago, that makes his days numbered. i would agree with kelly that if you're getting someone out of office for moral reasons, don't have him stick around for three months making decisions. have him out. >> but then who takes over and how, right? i guess the x-checker...

Months? , ., ., ., ., ~' months? they are going to make a 'oint months? they are going to make a joint speech. _ months? they are going to make a joint speech, the _ months? they are going to make a joint speech, the prime _ months? they are going to make a joint speech, the prime minister. months? they are going to make a i joint speech, the prime minister and the chancellor next month setting out the economic strategy and apparently tax cuts are not going to be part of it. which seems risky. i mean, we have 70% of borisjohnson's backbenchers don't have confidence in him. you have redwall sea...