C Delay News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from C delay. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In C Delay Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Early RCE Creates Gaps In Patent Term Adjustment Award


Early RCE Creates Gaps In Patent Term Adjustment Award
Tuesday, February 23, 2021
In 
Chudik V. Hirshfeld, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO’s determination that a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) award for “C” delay is not available when an examiner reopens prosecution after an Appeal Brief is filed, because an award for “C” delay requires actual appellate review. The court warned of the consequences of filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) early in the examination process instead of pursuing an appeal right away, because that prevented an award for “B” delay over the time periods at issue. While not at issue in this case, patent holders may be wondering when the USPTO will start calculating PTA correctly under the 2019  ....

Chudikv Hirshfeld , Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc , Federal Circuit , Patent Term Adjustment , Appeal Brief , Continued Examination , Issue Fee , Patent Trial , Appeal Board , Federal Circuit Decision , Judge Taranto , Judges Bryson , Supernus Pharmaceuticals , C Delay , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , முறையீடு சுருக்கமான , தொடர்ந்தது தேர்வு , பிரச்சினை கட்டணம் , காப்புரிமை சோதனை , முறையீடு பலகை , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று முடிவு , நீதிபதி டரான்டோ , நீதிபதிகள் பிரைசன் ,

C-Delay Patent Term Adjustment in PTAB


Thursday, February 18, 2021
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment for the Director of the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), holding that the statutory language authorizing so-called “C-delay” patent term adjustment requires an adverse patentability finding that is reversed by a court or the Patent Trial & Appeal Board. 
Chudik v. Hirshfeld, Case No. 20-1833 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2021) (Taranto, J.) C-delay adds to a patent’s term to account for delay experienced during appellate review of an adverse patentability finding. C-delay does not apply when the examiner reopens examination after final rejection (in this case, four times over an 11-year period) because appellate review is not triggered when an examiner, and not the Board or a court, undoes a final unpatentability decision by reopening examination. ....

Trademark Office , Us Court , Federal Circuit , Patent Trial , Patent Act , Federal Court , C Delay , Patent Term Adjustment , முத்திரை அலுவலகம் , எங்களுக்கு நீதிமன்றம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , காப்புரிமை சோதனை , காப்புரிமை நாடகம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் நீதிமன்றம் ,