Almost everyone in power claims to believe it. The push to war in syria, by the way has united politicians have both sides. Lindsey graham and howard dean typically agree on very little. Not much at all. But today they are both calling for war in syria. Graham is ghanelding massive attacks on the syrian military, dean is going even further than that on twitter, he called the president , quote a wimp for merely sending thousands of troops and launching tons of bombs at syria. Thats not enough for howard dean who you may remember once ran for president as the peace candidate. Tonight he wants total war in syria. Television pundits, of course, strongly agree. This morning the Foreign Policy team over on Msnbc Exexplained that its far more important for american troops to fight in syria than it is to secure our own border here in america u watch. There is no question that now all these years later is Donald Trumps challenge. He has to take action. He has spoken to macron. What he ought too
what s true. and who has rights and what are they? and so my question is, every country in central americari and i have been to six out of seven, is less good to live in than the united states. so, all the population of central america could plausibly claim asylum here. do we have a right to say no?? and how many absolutely. tucker: can we say no to? if we have that right, then why is no one in statewide office in california invoking that right?in why are they saying, we don t actually have a righthe to keep people out? no.o. what they are saying in california is that california is not obligatedif to enforce its federal immigration law. that s always been true. we can agree on that. that s not what these sanctuary city policies are really about. sanctuary city originally, if you look back at 20, 30 was enacted to protect the daca type p people. and 70% of americans believe
what s true. and who has rights and what are they? and so my question is, every country in central america and i have been to six out of seven, is less good to live in than the united states. so, all the population of central america could plausiblably claim asylum here. do we have a right to say no? and how many. absolutely. tucker: can we say no to? if we have that right, then why is no one in statewide office in california invoking that right? why are they saying we don t actually have a right to keep people out. no. what they are saying in california is that california is not obligated to enforce its federal immigration law. that s always been true. we can agree on that. that s not what these sanctuary city policies are really about. sanctuary city originally, if you look back at 20, 30 years ago when it first state-of-the-arted was enacted to protect the daca type people. and 70% of americans believe that we need to deal with daca. even our president believes that. if the pr