Page 14 - Call Record News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Question and we have established a straight, sharp line between the president and rudy giuliani. we have multiple witnesses who have told us that the president told them in the oval office on ukraine, talk to rudy. we have the establishment of rudy giuliani as the president's lawyer so there is an agency relationship there. so any act that rudy takes on behalf of the president is an act for the president. lawyers do not act outside of their clients' wishes and also what rudy giuliani was doing for the president is corroborated by the presidential call record, and what's interesting is, in that...

None of them talked to president trump about this ukraine scandal, wouldn't it be good to have somebody whether ambassador sondland or rudy giuliani or mick mulvaney, somebody who had talked to trump about this? >> this is just a first week of public hearings. we're going to have more. if you look at the witness depositions, sondland talked directly to the president a number of times. but beyond that, we have actual call record of july 25th between donald trump and lizzinski talking about military aide and donald trump asked for a favor though and when you read through the rest of the transcri...

The podium during that terrible press conference. those tweets are definitely kind of eyebrow-raising. "what are you talking about?" a little bit. when you have this much evidence, i don't think it impacts the inquiry at all. >> melissa: are sort of agree with what she's saying and sense that we all know what happened. the question is, do we think it's worth reversing an election? >> harris: of course we know what happened. that's on one side. on the flip side, you got adam schiff, the house until chair, who said at one point there is the whistleblower, "we might need to hear from the whistleb...

Action activities, why would a call record that the president would have the country believe was perfect, why would it be hidden in this classified system? clearly the white house does not want him to testify. they do not want the american people to know why mr. eisenberg or others made that decision. i think we can infer that the reason they don't want the public to hear from mr. eisenberg is that it would tend to corroborate allegations against the president. but that's the very reason we want to bring him in, and, of course, we are concerned that he, as a top lawyer in the administration, w...

Obstruction of our constitutional duties. these witnesses are significant and the white house understands they're significant. based on the testimony the committees have already received, we know that these witnesses, those that were in the law office of the national security council, those who worked for mulvaney either in the chief of staff's office or the office of management budget are firsthand witnesses to allegations of serious misconduct, both vis-a-vis the suspension of military aid and the effort to use that aid as a lever to get ukraine to do these political investigations to help t...