Page 15 - Call Record News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Obstruction of our constitutional duties. these witnesses are significant and the white house understands their significance. based on the testimony the committees have already received, we know these witnesses of those that were in the law office of the national security council, those who worked for mick mulvaney either in the chief of staff's office or the management budget men are first-hand witnesses to the allegation of serious misconduct. the effort to use that aid to get ukraine to do these political investigations to help the president's reelection campaign. but also in efforts to pot...

That would be beyond most individual's access and a system in which that call record did not belong. so very pertinent testimony, very relevant to the other witnesses who have come forward. we may infer by the white house obstruction here that their testimony would be further incriminating of the president. i will say this. it's quite obvious and we fully expected this. we have seen a series of shifting, ever-changing rationales for this campaign of obstruction. first there was the argument we won't comply, don't have to comply until there's a formal vote on the house floor. well, we had a for...

Most secret of intelligence activities, that is covert action activities. why would a call record that the president would have the country believe is perfect, why would it be hidden in this classified system? clearly the white house does not want him to testify. they do not want the american people to know why mr. eisenberg or others made that decision. i think we can infer that the reason is that it would tend to corroborate allegations against the president. that's the very reason we want to bring him in. and of course we are concerned that he as a top lawyer in the administration would eng...

That the white house defied. today we have four additional subpoenas to add to the list of a potential charge of the president of the united states and his obstruction of our constitutional duties. these witnesses are significant and the white house understands they're significant based on the testimony the committees have already received, we know these witnesses, those that were in the law office of the national security council, those who worked for mulvaney, either in the chief of staff's office or the office of management and budget are firsthand witnesses to allegations of serious miscon...

Mentioned in the rough transcript of the call or i should say the official record of the call, everybody was like, wow, that's kind of weird because burisma is mentioned in other places, that's just strange. but it turns out according to our reporting today vindman actually took copious notes. and when he tried to get this official call record corrected he said zelensky never said this weird phrase, the company you specifically mentioned in this issue. so it's not like an accident. it wouldn't be something you would say in a transcription or a person would take down in notes. it's not a phrase...