Page 2 - Campaign Language News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That has to be a concern for the administration as this case is heard in the high court. >> it is. i think this is something the president may be in good shape on. how much courts used campaign language in deciding the merits of this case. i have always thought that the trump administration has a better chance of winning in the supreme court than it did in the lower courts. the supreme court has been traditionally very reluctant to use the president's words as opposed to the text or order of the text of a statute in evaluating the constitutionality. >> this is a president who promised, repeate...

Senate intelligence committee is going to focus on just the russia part of this, the collusion, potential collusion and not delve into the obstruction of justice. so over to judiciary, i also just observing chuck grassley over the years wonder if this is going to be an opportunity for him to bring up the loretta lynch material that we had learned recently one would think he's going to want to score some political points for his team there if he opens up talking about obstruction of justice, getting on the record with loretta lynch, telling james comey to discuss this as a matter and not an inv...

Is he literally laid out as the prosecutor everything that shows that hillary clinton was guilty of this, and then at theha end,e takes the role away from loretta lynch and says that there should be no further prosecution. over stepping his bounds, and saying that there should be intent and that the statuteha tt requires intent is totally erroneous, untrue, and not in the statute. >> juan: he said there was no evidence, as i remember. >> kimberly: he listed the whole thing. and said, wow, this is going to happen.ha thatna: i wonder about in some ways, because he knew that loretta lynch had the...

That's what he said. >> jesse: would you like to about that? >> kimberly: i don't know. >> juan: why don't you interrupt. go ahead. >> jesse: i will interrupt briefly. he contorted to say there was no intent. he didn't need intent. she violated the law, and if her name wasn't clinton, she would have been behind bars. >> juan: oh, my gosh, . >> greg: this is the confirmation bias. you have two perfect examples here. you look at loretta lynch, and you say absolutely there is no there there. you look at trump and say there is no there there. but, at least comey actually said that loretta lynch pr...

So, all we are talking about -- >> jesse: would you like to hear about that? >> kimberly: i don't know, your cheeks are up here -- he is like this. >> jesse: i will interrupt briefly. he contorted the statute to say thated there was no intent. it didn't need intent. she violated the law,sh and have her name was in clinton, she wouldhe have been behind bars. everybody knows it. >> juan: oh, my gosh. get out of town. >> kimberly: she would have been a goner. >> greg: this is the confirmation bias of two sport politics. you have two perfect examples here. you look at loretta lynch, and you say ab...