Live Breaking News & Updates on Campaign Wittingly
Stay updated with breaking news from Campaign wittingly. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
convicted ex-president s latest bid to lift the gag order in the hush money interference case. what does it mean? right now donald trump is prohibited from attacking witnesses, prosecutors, jurors, court staff, and their family members. judge juan merchan has found donald trump to be in violation of the gag order ten times and the 11th could land him in jail as the judge has warned publicly. new york court refusing to hear trump s appeal, quote, upon the grounds that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. or asa friend joyce vance put it, donald trump s first amendment rights are not violated by the order. it is a rebuke, of course, to team trump which has argued it had constitutional questions of the highest importance. it was part of a political appreciate to getting the gag order lifted and there is an important reason for that. there is nothing, the only presidential candidate running as a convicted felon wants to do more than delegitimize this ....
That the president has been acid wously denying for more than a year now, that there was a in fact a major russian operation to interfere in the 2016 u. S. Election. And, you know, the Intelligence Community has been saying for a year now that they have high confidence that that is the case. And here you have the u. S. Department of justice and a grant Ju Grand Jury saying they can prove that beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law, using admissible evidence. And that, you know, is a Rod Rosenstein today was extremely careful not to offend the president and make sure that no americans were witting participants in this plot. But that is a remarkable factual repudiation of the entire
he was very careful to stay within what is alleged in the indictment. But he did make a point on several occasions of saying that ....
Were unwitting of the affiliation. i think this is, again, an indication of just how determined the russians were to undermine the integrity of the election, harm hillary clinton, and to enhance the prospects for donald trump s election. is unwittingly a term of art, to allow investigators to get as close as they can to the trump campaign, especially the three former campaign officials who have now pleaded guilty? could they help bob mueller get to the bottom of whether the trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly cooperated with the 13 individuals who were indicted today? well, yes. russian intelligence services frequently will cultivate relationships with individuals. they don t reveal russian intelligence connections. a lot of these individuals played along with. i think as the fbi team does the interviews of people, i think some lights were going off in ....
You re saying basically that this still leaves the door open to possible collusion? i ve spoken to white house officials who say, look, these indictments say that no one from the trump campaign wittingly worked with any of these russians, rod rosenstein came out today. doesn t this show that there was no collusion? it sounds like you have a different take. i have a very different take and i m sure that the white house counsel and the special counsel, ty cobb, are looking at this statute and saying, who else might this reach? while they ll obviously take the position that nobody wittingly was involved, there s some witnesses with people like michael flynn and george papadopoulos who might be able to finger people. we don t know who all they might have looked at, at this point. this is definitely an indictment to build on. you re right. we don t know what we don t ....
That initiate on the trump campaign wittingly engaged. but we re giving persons one, two, and three. are you giving any suspicions that there are people cooperating with bob mueller, like george popadopoulos, or carter page, or could they be three people we have never talked about? either is possible. and i don t know. but i do think, you know i do think as you said earlier that it is possible to read a little bit too much into the unwitting language here. indictments generally don t allege things that they re not prepared yet to prove, and something that is not an allegation of any witting collaboration of anyone on the trump campaign, doesn t mean one won t materialize over time. moreover, it s really important ....