Page 2 - Casey Ruling News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Ask you a question that i posed to josh gerstein who broke the story at the top of the hour. from the ruling the way it is written and again this is a caveat, what appears to be a first draft opinion, and it will likely go through many other iterations, and lots of changes, before we ultimately get the ruling, but based on what we've got, this remarkable leak of a first draft, and the way that justice alito has constructed this argument, if this survives in, if this mostly survives intact, is there anything here that would prevent republican-controlled states, or indeed a republican-controlled...

Supreme court and "politico," strike down the landmark roe v. wade decision, the draft opinion is a full unflynning repudiation which guaranteed constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision, planned parenthood v casey which largely maintained the right. roe was egregiously wrong from the start. we hold that roe and casey must be overturned. it is time to heed the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives. which as chris was mentioned, which means returning it to the states and then more than two dozen states, what are ...

We're going into a midterm season, where the republicans are poised to take the house and the senate, then, you know, president biden is still president biden and he will presumably veto such a measure, but in the event that we have a republican president in 2024, that's where we'd be. we would be in a south america style nationwide abortion ban in america. >> just to be clear, it would be, and i can't know the future, you and i think agree, it would be the first bill, it would be the first bill, it would be hr-1, and it would be s-1 in the senate. and i don't think it would be any question th...

Time line, after they got closing that a ruling like this is likely coming, we have now started to see, there used to be a taboo on saying that the doctors would go to prison and they're saying yeah, the doctors, they're not talking about this lightly, the doctors will go to prison but even more acutely, there used to be, until very recently, there was a taboo on saying that a woman raising a child who was raped or the victim of incest, at least they wouldn't be forced by the government to give birth against their will, to carry that pregnancy, to term, and give birth against their will, that ...

The roe v. wade precedent. our understanding is most of the republican colleagues want to go ahead and take down roe v. wade. and that said, we're at the beginning of may and the decision will not likely be published the until the end of june, maybe beginning of july so it is fair to say that it is a situation that is unresolved at this point and i can't promise you that various things may not change between now and late june. >> josh, in terms of the substance of this opinion as written, again, this draft majority opinion, and with the caveat that this is an historically unprecedented leak of...