Josh Gersstein News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

So it is possible there had been some changes since then but it is our best understanding at least where the court stood at that time which is about two and a half months after arguments in this pivotal mississippi abortion case. >> you report, josh, and again, forgive me if i get these details wrong, as i am learning this as we're talking about it but you report that the court majority here is established, that there are at least in the initial conference between the justices after the arguments, there were five votes on justice alito's reported side here, and the only ambiguity, the only que...

With josh and his colleagues at "politico," that it is a work report, whether or not it is revised before it is ultimately published. the bottom line here is that this is, this would appear to be the day that, i mean i was born in 1973, which is when roe v. wade was passed, in my entire life, women have been talking about the day that this will come. and that roe v. wade could be overturned and that the united states would become a country in which abortion was treated as a crime. and it was the government, was the state, that is allowed to decide whether or not men give birth, it is the state...

Supreme court and "politico," strike down the landmark roe v. wade decision, the draft opinion is a full unflynning repudiation which guaranteed constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision, planned parenthood v casey which largely maintained the right. roe was egregiously wrong from the start. we hold that roe and casey must be overturned. it is time to heed the constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives. which as chris was mentioned, which means returning it to the states and then more than two dozen states, what are ...

Y, because it's different, and yet it often does get applied that way. but there's no question, he's trying to keep this confined to the issue of abortion. >> and of course, that's funny, that's telling itself, right, that you would be willing to say, it's just about abortion and not about anything important, don't worry, tells you the frame of mind of, the frame of mind behind people who would make this kind of a change. let me ask you about one last piece of this, josh. since we've been on the air, since we received your reporting tonight, since you published, we, on my show, have contacted ...

Apple. none of that is surprising but to have this draft opinion on the internet is shocking. >> it is shocking as you said and as we started discussing here, it is shocking both in substance and also shocking in terms of what it means about the court, and what it means about the stakes here that someone was willing to do this. it is just a remarkable thing. chris, thank you for handling as legitimately breaking, sort of overwhelming breaking news. i'm going to pick this up right now, including with the reporter who just broke this story. thank you, my friend. >> thank you. before i bring on...