Stay updated with breaking news from Chapter 93a. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Where a plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that the defendant insurance company improperly failed to pay damages for the “inherent diminution in value” of his automobile after an accident caused by one of its insureds, the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint to add new claims under Chapters 93A and 176D should be
Where a plaintiff has filed a putative class action under G.L.c. 93A over a defendant insurance company’s use of a “projected sold adjustment” in determining the actual cash value of a damaged vehicle, the plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded a violation of Chapter 93A based upon the predicate of a violation of G.L.c. 176D, §3(9)(a), but
Where the commonwealth has filed a complaint alleging that Grubhub violated the delivery fee cap statute, the commonwealth’s motion for summary judgment should be allowed because the statute unambiguously includes order processing fees. “Grubhub argues that it is entitled to summary judgment because it did not violate the Delivery Fee Cap Statute. In the alternative,
A Superior Court judge has found that six attorneys who departed their firm to start a competing firm did not violate Chapter 93A by copying client files and databases before they left. The defendants, non-equity partners of the now-defunct plaintiff Governo Law Firm in Boston, took a large chunk of GLF’s business when they left
Where the commonwealth has requested a preliminary injunction against a defendant in the business of making high-interest loans to homeowners, that request should be granted because the commonwealth is likely to succeed in proving that the defendant has engaged in a pattern of unfair and deceptive conduct in violation of G.L.c. 93A. “MV Realty PBC,