CNN Wolf December 7, 2015 18:19:00
No firearm, deadly force may be justified base odd on the facts and the circumstances, but conversely the mere possession of a firearm by someone does not automatically authorize deadly force. it is the threat that is posed by the firearm, and that threat must be fleshed out by the facts ash and you can see that is exactly what the prosecutors in the case were seeking to do, and establish not only the existence of a firearm, but establish evidence of the threat that particular firearm posed. >> to that end, to that end, the state's attorney outlined that there was another officer involved in t...
Source: archive.org