democratic party. do you think that s fair? i mean, he s challenging the creepy porn lawyer is challenging don jr. to mixed martial arts matches. i m not a fan of o rourke. i m a cruz lawyer. but he s right on this one. is this really the guy you want chargi charging ahead on the battlefield, representing people in porn cases against the president, throwing out allegations widely debunked by media people. i mean, this is the future? and the fact that he s showing up in these states and gathering crowds doesn t really speak well for the democratic party right now. you guys are in a lot of trouble. tucker: i agree. i m with beto o rourke on that as well. great to see you as always. thank you. well, there s one thing left stands for, it s against the
canada, i don t know what the rules of evidence are there. but here in america, you would have to authenticate that video evidence and you really wouldn t have a lot of drug simple possession cases based on video evidence alone. from my years in canada, there s a lot more gag orders that come out. and in a circumstance like this when you have someone who is at his level of public responsibility, does that make a difference or is he any joe citizen when it comes to chargi charging, trying, and sentencing? there s no question that being a funnel figure subjects you to more scrutiny. like i said, a simple possession case would be highly unusual for the police to base their evidence on a video alone. i think a lot of defense attorneys have said, and i agree with this, that when it comes to the burden of proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, juries take a