Page 31 - Christopher Wiley News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Like he really needs to give, you and americans? >> how do you fix this? and this is really about 87 million people. we know lately in the last week found out it was 37 million more than we thought, and that is literally the combined population of california, texas and new york. that's how many people's facebook profiles were given to a russian professor, russian-american professor who then somehow gave did to cambridge analytica. we still haven't gotten to the bottom of what happened. although a whistleblower, wiley was on "meet the press" this morning with chuck todd. he said it's possible t...

>> and are you cooperating? >> i -- i plan to be. we're just setting out dates that i can actually go down and meet with them. >> is it both with congress and mr. mueller or is it both entities that are doing investigations? >> it's -- as i understand it, my lawyer is the one interfacing with them, but it is both congressional investigations and also law enforcement and the department of justice. >> all right. >> you can see my complete interview with christopher wylie on our website meetthepress.com. up next, the success of "roseanne" got us thinking about the shows democrats and republican...

And that it could be stored in various parts of the world including russia given the fact that, the professor who was managing the data harvesting was going back and forth between the uk and russia. >> is it your understanding that facebook could not verify how many people have this data or could they? >> well, once data leaves your system and once data leaves, you know, your database, it's a fungible thing, you can make as many copies as possible, so it isn't actually materially possible to verify if -- if that data has been eliminated from the existence of the universe because another copy c...

And 87 million profiles were actually accessed and then you tweeted this, mr. wylie, yep, it was actually 87 million facebook profiles, could be more, to be honest. media couldn't publish full number before because of legal threat. so when you a originally gave your first interview on this you knew it was 87 million, but you could legally only say 50 million?" the new york times and the guardian said 50 million and it was the thing that they had the most amount of evidence to show. when i met with the british authorities earlier in the year, one of the things that i said was that actually the ...

Morning with chuck todd. he said it's possible that this information is housed in russia, that he doesn't rule it out that some of it has been housed there. obviously these are some of the kind of questions we want answered. but i think what's really important, and there will be a bunch much senators asking questions, so not just dwelling on the past, but how they are going to fix it moving forward. >> we actually have a clip of that interview that christopher wiley did with chuck. let's look at a little bit of t. >> it was quite clear early on steve bannon absolutely wanted to use it for, you...