Stay updated with breaking news from Civil Practice. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Where a plaintiff was reclassified as a Level 3 sex offender, a remand is necessary because the hearing examiner committed legal error in refusing to consider scholarly articles relevant to the risk of reoffense. “Plaintiff John Doe appeals from a judgment of the Middlesex County Superior Court affirming his reclassification as a level three sex
Where defendants charged with causing the submission of false claims to Medicare because of kickbacks moved to compel certain Medicare claims data, the defendants failed to establish the relevance of the overly broad data request, so a U.S. magistrate judge’s decision to deny that request should be upheld. “This case arises out of an action by
Where a Superior Court judge affirmed a plaintiff’s classification by the Sex Offender Registry Board as a Level 3 sex offender, the judgment must be vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings because the hearing examiner erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for expert funds. “The extent to which [John] Doe suffers from paraphilias
HOUSTON - The 14th Court of Appeals today affirmed a governmental immunity ruling in favor of the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County in a lawsuit brought over a motorcycle injury.
Ordinarily, when a North Carolina resident, who is a non-party to out-of-state litigation, receives a subpoena under the North Carolina Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, the non-party’s objections to the subpoena will be heard by the North Carolina court in which discovery is sought. However, the non-party here is a law firm, and its ...