Stay updated with breaking news from Claire and jason. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
summary judgment of a massive ought yen of viewers, a past logical fear of a ratings defeat and witches ease brew against in a network s own working journalists and fact checkers. we should tell you at any moment we re expecting breaking news in the form of fresh filens from dominion and fox, to lay out any arguments in the case. while we wait, for years we have turned to phrases lie inside the bubble and the echo chamber to describe that relationship between fox news and its viewers. never before has it been so plain to see from the outside. the discovery filings show that fox hosts were telling their viewers what they knew they wanted to here even when the very same fox news host communicated the truth to one another in private, which was different from what they were broadcasting. dominion s case may very well wrest on their ability to get a jury to understand that distinction. today, though, the story goes even further in the form of something rare. a highly vis ....
And friends. former senator claire mccaskill is here. also joining us editor at yar at the bulwark. just charlie sikes is back. jason is ban back, an msnbc contributor and npr media correspondent, david fulcrum is back. sit start with you, david. fox is, if nothing else, most like the republican party in its ability to fall in line and remain dis planned when under attack. that seems to be holding so far. what s your sense of the dynamic? there s a feel they re under siege with a $1.6 billion lawsuit, which is a real legal threat, and legal peril. there s also periods of having essentially, you know, the rock is lifted and we re able to see ....
Charlie and jason. a brand-new filing was made today by dominion, called an answering brief. david did a good job of explaining it to us non-lawyers. it s more in the sworn testimony of rupert murdoch, there s others in this new filing if says, while fox does argue at time neutrally without endorsing invite lying about dominion, the report demonstrates the opposite. the hosts repeatedly endorsed the stolen likes. question you are aware now that fox did more than simply post these guests and give them a phone call. answer from rupert march talk i think you have er from rupert - i think you have ....
Dominion has documented that people within fox has said this stuff isn t true. so, david, we were lucky to get you on the front end of this drop. i m going to ask you, claire and jason and charlie, can tell you with the hotel california, you can check out, if you never leave. if you come acrossening, wave year arms. thank you. we, for our part, we re going to continue to pore through this very large document. we ll share it with all our guests and try to bring some legal guests online. there s another story in the same vein to tell you about. george santos, how they re getting on the offense on the broader topic of lying, and ties as many republicans they can to ....
The path and we re going to make money, because we re going to try to appeal to a certain audience philosophically in america. they wandered a bit off the path, but they could still see the path. they wandered further and it began to get overgrown and all of a sudden the path was not so visible. now they are in the thick underbrush and they are lost. they have no guideposts other than telling they people exactly what they want to hear, facts bedamned. it s a sad commentary on what has happened to what something that they like to call themselves, a news organization. jason, what is interesting to me, too as an ex-republican, and as someone in the cable news business actually is when this happened. norm ate fox news, i think they achieved 12r50rd success appeared broke every record ....