Stay updated with breaking news from Clinton coverage. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
uranium to russia. that's not true in exchange for clinton donations. it was ruled false. the other story that all the other papers did, that was obsessive. a word cloud on hillary clinton if you do that during the campaign, the big word is e-mails. >> absolutely. >> it is what the media obsessed over day after day after day and there was a study that was actually done that said clinton's e-mails got as much front page coverage in six days as her policies got in 69 days. these findings were pub 3w4rishd in the columbia journalism review. the starkest discovery that in just the six days they ran as many stories about her e-mails as all policies. this was your beef in your tweet. what do you make of that fact? >> yeah. no, if you look back at the clinton coverage, there was very little policy coverage. why was that? the reason there was so little policy coverage is the press created this entire brand-new category of e-mails so, you
donald trump tape opposed to the wikileaks and the clinton coverage, the media would be prosecuting this case for donald trump which is the right thing to do. there are significant things that have come out in these wikileaks that hillary clinton has never had to open for. she said she's not for open borders, we know she is. she thinks that wall street should govern themselves and these are all the things she told the american people were never true. we also know today, donald trump is up 1% in a poll, and if you look four years ago in 2012, they were the most accurate poll according to 538, which tracks all the polls of poll. ibd was the most accurate poll four years ago and they said donald trump is up one point. this race is dead even. >> our coverage continues right after this quick break. three hours now from the final face-off in a presidential election like no other. we'll be right back.
transitory as everything else. what you say yesterday is not necessarily what you might say today or tomorrow. there's plenty of time to apologize for whatever you said and to make it up. somebody who doesn't like it today might be your friend tomorrow based upon what's happening in the world and what you say. >> talking about evangelical voters, on npr.org, drilling down on that. evangelical leaders and talking with voters outside trump's event in greenville a couple of weeks ago in south carolina. one thing i kept hearing was, he says he's never asked for forgiveness. he talked about communion in a different way. >> evangelical leaders i talked to that were anti-trump think he is a fraud anyway way. he is sort of tapping into that sentiment. they feel like the republican party has abandoned them. they were promised these things. they feel like they've been taking for granted. sort of the enemy of my enemy is
hillary clinton, especially the washington press corps, which may bring its own historical and spousal baggage to what should be unbiased. depending on which reporters you rely on as the most lopsided, scrutinize or a truly criminal scandal? clinton backers are especially upset with "the new york times" which they believe fixated on e-mail as a scandal. sumed it up this week, clinton coverage, "the new york times" will have a special place in hell. now the times errorioneously reported that -- and they say clinton is not a target of any criminal probe. the fbi is reviewing these classification issues.