Collateral Damage Advantage News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

So, i'm good with that. all those little drones, turn the sprinklers on. then everyone with a had on was good. >> greg: pete, i think what tyrus is saying is right that be an anti- drone weapons is inhuman. wars will drag out longer if you are not highly specific in your targets. if you can argue against these your allowing terrorists to have the collateral damage advantage. they will always use human targets. these weapons are designed by minimizing collateral damage by specifically's focusing on the target. so i think the argument is really dangerous. i think it's a scare tactic.

So, i'm good with that. all those little drones, turn the sprinklers on. then everyone with a had on was good. >> greg: pete, i think what tyrus is saying is right that be an anti- drone weapons is inhuman. wars will drag out longer if you are not highly specific in your targets. if you can argue against these your allowing terrorists to have the collateral damage advantage. they will always use human targets. these weapons are designed by minimizing collateral damage by specifically's focusing on the target. so i think the argument is really dangerous. i think it's a scare tactic.

So, i'm good with that. all those little drones, turn the sprinklers on. then everyone with a had on was good. >> greg: pete, i think what tyrus is saying is right that be an anti- drone weapons is inhuman. wars will drag out longer if you are not highly specific in your targets. if you can argue against these your allowing terrorists to have the collateral damage advantage. they will always use human targets. these weapons are designed by minimizing collateral damage by specifically's focusing on the target. so i think the argument is really dangerous. i think it's a scare tactic.

So, i'm good with that. all those little drones, turn the sprinklers on. then everyone with a had on was good. >> greg: pete, i think what tyrus is saying is right that be an anti- drone weapons is inhuman. wars will drag out longer if you are not highly specific in your targets. if you can argue against these your allowing terrorists to have the collateral damage advantage. they will always use human targets. these weapons are designed by minimizing collateral damage by specifically's focusing on the target. so i think the argument is really dangerous. i think it's a scare tactic.