Page 21 - Collusion Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That part out, and the original drafting also had in that multiple foreign intelligence agencies had hacked into hillary clinton's email server and that means top-secret, classified special access programming information was in fact obtained by america's enemies and none of it would have been redacted, sir. >> if you were somebody who was on hillary's campaign team at the time and you could suggest changes to be made to that statement, he would have suggested that exactly the changes that peter strzok insisted on, to try to reduce hillary's level of recklessness and her probability. if he was ...

Law. they changed the wording to take that part out and the original drafting also had in that multiple foreign intelligence agencies had hacked into hillary clinton's e-mail server and that means top secret classified special access programming information was in fact obtained by america's enemies and none of it would have been redacted, sir. >> so if you were somebody on hill's campaign team at the time and could have suggested changes to be made, you would have suggested the changes that peter strzok insisted on to try to reduce hillary's level of recklessness and her culpability. what does...

From his office that could implicate the president. now we hear maybe rod rosenstein, here i stand, willing to take a bullet just like michael cohen said he would. if rosenstein is gone, how much more proof do you need the president of the united states is attempting to obstruct mueller's investigation? i think you have a huge building up case and it's not going to be up for debate. it's going to be uncontroverted evidence that president trump had something going on with the russians. >> we see a bunch of people that could be flipped by mueller. people that trump does business with, seedy char...

He wasn't necessarily under oath, but we now do officially have him on the record. that's a small victory for mr. avenatti. the question is where does this go from here? the judges don't necessarily seem to be siding with stormy's case. the president's team wants to force this to arbitration. that's what the contract mandates. it seems like that might be where this is going. all along, i think at the end of the day when you look at how this situation has unfolded, we're hearing mixed messages actually from both sides. so it's just hard to make any sort of judgment right now. the president did ...

Always takes the hit, so i don't think this is a new thing for michael cohen, but now we have president trump on the record, you do have that, that's a small victory for mr. avanatti. the question is, where does this go from here? the judges don't necessarily be siding with stormy's case. the judges want to force this to arbitration, that's what the contract mandates and i think that might be where this is going. at the end of the day, when you look at how this situation has unfolded, we're hearing mixed messages actually from both sides. so it's just hard to make any sort of judgment right no...