Page 14 - Combat Capability News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Военный обозреватель kp.ru Виктор Баранец - о том, что пишут про армию России в иностранных СМИ

It has been developed under the transfer of technology (TOT) from Lockheed Martin to Ashok Leyland. It is completely indigenised and developed in India, Ashok Leyland added.

Ashok Leyland delivers light bullet proof vehicles to IAF ANI | Updated: Apr 16, 2021 15:23 IST Chennai (Tamil Nadu) [India], April 16 (ANI): Hinduja Group's flagship company Ashok Leyland has strengthened its armoured vehicle platform by delivering light bullet proof vehicles (LBPVs) to the Indian Air Force. The LBPV is an adopted version of Lockheed Martin's common vehicle next gen (CVNG) and has been developed under transfer of technology. However, it is completely indigenied and developed in India. Each vehicle has got four main characteristics that m...

Assistance? >> sir, the way i would phrase is it is that there was some kind of an issue, yes. >> months before president trump froze the money, the department of defense in consultation with state sent a letter to congress certifying, and you said this in your opening statement, the government of ukraine has taken substantial actions to make defense institutional reforms for the purposes of decreasing corruption, increasing accountability and sustaining improvements of combat capability enabled by u.s. assistance. so by the time president trump froze the aid, the department of defense had spe...

That approximates my understanding of the provision. >> okay. i will go with that approximate. thank you very much. i yield back the balance of my time. >> as paul harvey said, the rest of the story. my colleague failed to put certain issues with respect to certification. dod certification was not for corruption throughout the entire country of ukraine, it was institutional reforms and combat capability, is that correct? >> yes, sir. >> first, thank you for being here this afternoon. i appreciate that. my colleague seemed to leave that out. he read your statement but the corrective emphasis. t...