Page 18 - Communications Guy News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Jennifer, have you ever heard of such a thing in your time in politics? >> this is absolutely stunning. first of all, that he would be threatened apparently by a meek question you heard on the audio, a very politely posed question. and there are ways of manner in which candidates say i don't want to talk to you or, as he initially did, go talk to my communications guy or scram. but to physically accost someone, throw them down on the floor, potentially injure them -- what is wrong with this man? i mean this is really sort of appalling. and i do want to say that there is a cost to continually b...

Question you heard on the audio, a very politely posed question. and there are ways of manner in which candidates say i don't want to talk to you or, as he initially did, go talk to my communications guy or scram. but to physically accost someone, throw them down on the floor, potentially injure them -- what is wrong with this man? i mean this is really sort of appalling. and i do want to say that there is a cost to continually berating the meeting. there is a cost to labeling these people, myself included, enemies, the opposition, continuing to berate them, calling on crowds to hoot and holle...

Know, a month and a half ago, that the president wiretapped him was correct because there was testimony that, you know, names were unmasked and not authorized by the white house that could have included members of his staff. >> you know, doug, as a republican, as a republican strategist, as a former communications guy, you have got sean spicer in the bushes or among the bushes. i like how they had to correct their reporting. aside from that and you've got sara huk by sandering doing the briefing, this white house has completely changed its story. a 180 on whether the president it was rosenstei...

Said there's no connection to russia. nobody in the know. they said proof of collusion words matter. collusion means you are working with the russians. we see no proof of that. they're continuing to look there early in that process but no connection, we see nothing but connection. >> i mean, when clapper, when he said no evidence of collusion that was covered all over the place. >> sure, no question. you didn't go after the new york times is wrong. that piece of the new york times didn't mention anything like what the president is talking about. that's why i said strong and wrong. the problem ...

Instantaneously and that actually does cause a problem. >> without a question. fdr would write in a first draft of his speech. terrible things about a guy. a new speech writer came and said you can't do that. old one said wait until we get to second draft and third draft and by fourth draft it's gone but he felt great because he got it out of his system. there has to be some ritual that works out because it won't be easy to be a governing president and have tweets in the middle of the night. >> joe, can i talk about the tweeting? i was a communications guy. i actually think his tweeting is gre...