Lords want to repeal law that backs reliability of computer evidence in wake of Post Office scandal
The House of Lords is attempting to change a law that presumes computer evidence is reliable to prevent a repeat of the Post Office Horizon scandal.
Stay updated with breaking news from Computer Evidence. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The House of Lords is attempting to change a law that presumes computer evidence is reliable to prevent a repeat of the Post Office Horizon scandal.
A U.K. IT professional body is calling for a change in the law to remove a legal presumption that computer systems data is always correct.
Its very difficult for anybody to prove something when you dont have that disclosure and all of that information that the technical other side already have. This may seem like a Side Story to the post office scandal, but for the lawyers who are calling for change, there is a pressing need for the presumption that Computer Evidence is correct to be urgently reviewed, to avoid the risk of yet more miscarriages ofjustice. How many conservative mps dont have confidence in rishi sunak� s approach to illegal migration and his latest Rwanda Legislation . Well, we should find out this week. If mps o...
Other side already have. this may seem like a side story to the post office scandal, but for the lawyers who are calling for change, there is a pressing need for the presumption that computer evidence is correct to be urgently reviewed, to avoid the risk of yet more miscarriages ofjustice. how many conservative mps don't have confidence in rishi sunak�*s approach to illegal migration and his latest rwanda legislation? well, we should find out this week. if mps on the right of the tory party fail to make his plans to stop the boats any tighter or tougher in the coming 2a hours or so with vari...
Handling of disclosure. It said. Paul marshall was one of the main signatories. The recommendation that we made in our paper is that there should be an automatic obligation on the part of any party who wants to rely on Computer Evidence to give disclosure of two things in effect. One is to disclose actual knowledge of bugs in The System, and what those effects were and are known to have been. And secondly, The System was properly managed and properly audited