these relationships that these accusations were either fabricated or were con sensual. on the other hand you have prosecution saying a pattern of rape here. also saying that harvey weinstein used his power in hollywood to sexual assault women. now, the jury has heard from about 50 different witnesses. this trial started in late october. so it has been a long one and they heard from the four accusers. that includes the first lady of california, jennifer newsom also a filmmaker who says harvey weinstein raped her. his attorney saying this is consensual. this back and forth and now we wait for the jury to see who they believe. thank you. for the first time the cruise ship passenger pulled from the ocean last week after falling over board is speaking out. it is an incredible story.
happened to me, too. me, too, has been the phrase used consistently in this case. in front of those jurors, they were able to hear those who not only espoused the sentiment of me, too. if he is to serve all the jail time, the sentencing is still out there. i want to note that unlike the first trial where they were trying to paint this as a romantic endeavor perhaps, one that was con sensual, this time the defense decided to say this was essentially the equivalent of a gold digger, based on the civil settlement that obviously did not speak well to the jurors in this case. they did not buy into the notion that it was somebody who is motivated by a financial settlement or otherwise. now you have this very unique position. the very first time that you have a celebrity high-profile metoo case, and this only a day
question. now he has come out and said something. do you think he s telling the truth? it s very suspect that he s telling the truth. i think he didn t want to respond to a question, he got forced into answering, saying something, so he had little choice. but you know, erin, he s handled this whole thing differently than most of his perceived enemies, where he goes after them and he s on the offense. here he s been solely on the defense and i keep wondering what else is larger for him in this issue? does he have some sort of prenuptial at risk, some sort of postup ini inuptial at risk? there s something else going on here. stormy daniels had said this was con sensual. the crucial question here, though, paul is that the reason that this whole situation matters, there s multiple reason, putting aside the ethics and character of the president of the united states, was there