Page 2 - Concise Way News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Spill investigation? >> i wouldn't be able to speculate about whether this fits into one or the other categories, but there's no question that it's not necessarily a binary, and even if the justice department, one would certainly assume and hope is trying to figure out the extent to which potentially mishandled classified information could have been inadvertently or deliberately shared with people who shouldn't have been able to see it, that wouldn't preclude doj from simultaneously looking at the possibility of law breaking in association with the way that that classified material was handlin...

Mar-a-lago last night always seemed like a possibility, but don't let that detract from the truly historic nature of what we're now seeing play out right in front of us, something we might very well end up telling our descendents about. never before in american history has the fbi searched the home of a former commander in chief. for that reason, the department of justice has a very high bar to clear. the burden will be on the government, not only to explain what it was looking for with this search but why search was required, why they couldn't get it some other way, either through cooperation...

His advisors committed crimes so that's no longer a debating point. what matters now is whether garland has the resolve to place all that damning evidence before a jury and whether that jury could be convinced that trump broke the law. those are strategic issues garland must consider, just as he must weigh the political consequences of taking trump to court. in the end, though, garland's primary responsibilities aren't gauging what kind of jury pool he'll encounter or how it will ripple across magaland. garland's core duty is to charge trump for the crimes he committed and let the judicial pro...

Their information had been provided and returned when it wasn't. >> right. >> so i do find that is going to be a potentially aggravating factor if and when the department gets to the decision of whether there should be charges here. >> right. so andrea actually tweeted last night in a clear, concise way, said what's next, presumably trump told the doj he returned everything classified and the search revealed he did not. he would be subject to false statement, criminal charge and theft of government property and other similar crimes. let's talk about the law here. lemire, here's the law in ques...

Saying really smart things all the time, which is why i wanted to have you on the show. nicole and i were talking about the garland perplex, what to make of him and there's been a lot of confusion, tea leaf reading and a lot of speculation about his mindset up until yesterday, and i'm curious about the two-part question, one, do you agree with the consensus that he would have signed off on the decision to do this search? number one. and number two, given all of your background at the fbi, and as a student of merrick garland at this point, what do you take away from this action about what it sa...