Stay updated with breaking news from Concurrent List. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Article 370, as it existed even before its abrogation in 2019, acknowledged that J&K was an integral part of India. As held by the top court, this provision, together with the state's Instrument of Accession (IOA) and its ruler's proclamation adopting the Indian Constitution, wiped out the former princely state's sovereignty.
A Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Mini Pushkarna asked how States can be restricted from having different curriculum.
On Monday (December 11), the Supreme Court will deliver its verdict on petitions challenging the Centre’s decision to make changes to Article 370, and reorganise the state into the two Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh. Here are some of the key arguments of the petitioners.
Article The Supreme Court is poised to settle the debates surrounding the abrogation of Article 370 when it delivers its verdict on Monday. A debate in the Indian Parliament on November 27, 1963 encapsulates the essence of the issue
Kota Kinabalu: The Sabah Legislative Assembly on Thursday approved a Bill that strengthens the State Government’s authority to levy fees and charges, with the aim of generating revenue for the State Government.