Page 4 - Consensus Builders News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The kind of consumer demand that will then cause the private sector to really start staffing up in a way that we need them to staff up to have full employment. but that should be the goal. full employment. >> terry, going back to the fiscal slope negotiations, there's basically no women really involved in the high level negotiations. nancy pelosi is sort of a side player as she was in the debt ceiling negotiations. research has shown that female legislators attract more co-sponsors for their bills, indicating they're better at consensus building. other research also shows in business and in th...

In a row would be extremely rare. house democrats are counting on a lot of redistricting in the wake of the census, the 2010 census maybe gave them a few seats in texas. but we're talking about an eight-seat democratic swing on a good night. and back on the senate, you got to take into account the coattail factor for president obama as well. wisconsin, virginia. if he does well in virginia, tim kaine does well. if he does well in wisconsin, then tammy baldwin does well over tommy thompson. >> i want to get both of your take over something. big picture here. the "new york times" reporting this ...

Than they did, consulting the wider array of intelligence that existed, listening to other people than just the consensus builders. and we would have come out with a very different situation. and i agree with mr. rove that congress might not have approved it. and that's the reason -- and he tells us very clearly -- that's the reason as the downing street memo said they had to fix the intelligence around the policy. >> colonel lawrence wilkerson, former chief of staff to colin powell, secretary of state. thank you very much for your time and unique insights on this history. >> thanks for having...

Lied knowing we were lying. but the intelligence community and the political operators worked together in a colossal form of group think, in my view, because they all thought it doesn't matter what we say here. the details are irrelevant. because when we invade, we're going to find weapons of mass destruction and, therefore, we'll all be exonerated. well, they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. and someone should have begun asking those questions earlier than they did, consulting the wider array of intelligence that existed, listening to other people than just the consensus builders....