Page 4 - Conspiracy Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Conspiracy question, they don't have the substantive nugget in there. that is probably why there is no conspiracy charge. they have plenty on stone with his blatant lying and witness tampering. i think that is really important here because so much of the indictments has been about false statements and covering up. obviously, common sense asks why are they so concerned about this? was stone just trying to walk it back or does he have something more substantive that he is trying to cover up here? we see the way that the president and giuliani are trying to witness tamper with michael cohen. the ...

Confirmed. there are some specific things they have to share with congress like if there was a disagreement about who to prosecute or some other major decision. there is not really a lot that says this has to be made public or has to be shared. the reason are looking at the executive privilege thing is we know they won't bring charges against the president. they are operating under justice department guidelines. when you look at the question of obstruction, the white house wants to shield the american public from learning details about the possibility that the president may have tried to obstr...

Of the special counsel's office. does the special counsel make a statement like that in court if that line of inquiry, the russia conspiracy question, is closed and if michael cohen's contribution was in any way minimal? or should we take that statement at face value? >> i think we should take it at face value. they're continue to work on this. michael cohen provided them significant information they found very useful. remember, in michael cohen's sentencing it was the special counsel's office that was giving him the cooperation he wanted to get a lower sentence from. sdny said he didn't help ...

Say, mr. president, do not do this -- do not go for them and do this investigation to testify or whatever. because, the president did a 90 some odd minute rally, off the cut, 90 minutes straight. these questions, it's not going to be a one hour, two hour, it's going to be a very long conversation. i think that are right. what they're doing to do is say, let him talk. open up these broad questions. what i try to do in my life i don't try to ask a question that i don't know the answer. i think mueller and his team know the answers to the questions. it's about the follow-up questions that they ha...

Us that the investigation still relates to -- there are serious questions about obstruction, about, you know, the firing of mr. comey and the firing of mr. flynn, questions about jeff sessions and so it really -- and also questions about the collusion aspect and, you know, really that's a conspiracy question, but there are questions related to that. so it's a very broad and far-reaching. there's really nothing that's off the table i think in these questions. >> it's interesting, general hayden. if i'm doing an interview and i have 40 questions i want to ask somebody written down, that's -- tha...